Suppr超能文献

度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症:一项双盲临床试验。

Duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a double-blind clinical trial.

作者信息

Goldstein David J, Mallinckrodt Craig, Lu Yili, Demitrack Mark A

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, and Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University Medical School, Indianapolis 46285, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;63(3):225-31. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n0309.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Duloxetine hydrochloride, a dual reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine, was evaluated for therapeutic efficacy and safety/tolerability in the treatment of major depression.

METHOD

In an 8-week multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 173 patients (aged 18-65 years) with DSM-IV major depressive disorder were randomly allocated to receive placebo (N = 70), duloxetine (N = 70), or fluoxetine, 20 mg q.d. (N = 33). Duloxetine dose was titrated in the first 3 weeks in a forced-titration regimen from 40 mg (20 mg b.i.d.) to 120 mg/day (60 mg b.i.d.). Patients were required to have a Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)-Severity of Illness scale score of at least moderate severity (> or = 4) and a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) total score of at least 15. Patients could not have had any current primary DSM-IV Axis I diagnosis other than major depressive disorder, or any anxiety disorder as a primary diagnosis within the past year, excluding specific phobias. The primary efficacy measurement was the HAM-D-17 total score, and secondary measures included the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, CGI-Severity of Illness and CGI-Improvement, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement. Safety was evaluated by recording the occurrence of discontinuation rates and treatment-emergent adverse events and by measurement of vital signs and laboratory analytes.

RESULTS

Duloxetine was superior to placebo in change on the HAM-D-17 (p = .009). Estimated probabilities of response and remission were 64% and 56%, respectively, for duloxetine, compared with 52% and 30% for fluoxetine and 48% and 32% for placebo. Duloxetine was numerically superior to fluoxetine on the primary and most of the secondary outcome measures. In general, duloxetine was well tolerated; 76% of patients achieved the maximum dose, and insomnia and asthenia were the only adverse events reported statistically significantly (p < .05) more frequently by duloxetine-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that duloxetine is efficacious for the treatment of major depressive disorder and is well tolerated and safe.

摘要

背景

盐酸度洛西汀是一种5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素双重再摄取抑制剂,已对其治疗重度抑郁症的疗效及安全性/耐受性进行了评估。

方法

在一项为期8周的多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,173例年龄在18至65岁之间、患有DSM-IV重度抑郁症的患者被随机分配接受安慰剂(N = 70)、度洛西汀(N = 70)或氟西汀(每日20 mg,N = 33)治疗。度洛西汀剂量在前3周采用强制滴定方案从40 mg(每日2次,每次20 mg)滴定至120 mg/天(每日2次,每次60 mg)。要求患者的临床总体印象(CGI)-疾病严重程度量表评分至少为中度严重(≥4),且17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D-17)总分至少为15分。除重度抑郁症外,患者目前不能有任何其他原发性DSM-IV轴I诊断,或在过去一年内不能有任何作为原发性诊断的焦虑症,但特定恐惧症除外。主要疗效指标为HAM-D-17总分,次要指标包括蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表、CGI-疾病严重程度和CGI-改善情况,以及患者总体改善印象。通过记录停药率和治疗中出现的不良事件的发生情况以及测量生命体征和实验室分析物来评估安全性。

结果

度洛西汀在HAM-D-17评分变化方面优于安慰剂(p = 0.009)。度洛西汀的有效率和缓解率估计概率分别为64%和56%,而氟西汀分别为52%和30%,安慰剂分别为48%和32%。在主要和大多数次要结局指标上,度洛西汀在数值上优于氟西汀。总体而言,度洛西汀耐受性良好;76%的患者达到最大剂量,与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比,接受度洛西汀治疗的患者报告的失眠和乏力是仅有的在统计学上显著更频繁出现的不良事件(p < 0.05)。

结论

这些数据表明度洛西汀对治疗重度抑郁症有效,耐受性良好且安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验