Suppr超能文献

度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症:与剂量递增相关的安全性和耐受性

Duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: safety and tolerability associated with dose escalation.

作者信息

Wohlreich Madelaine M, Mallinckrodt Craig H, Prakash Apurva, Watkin John G, Carter William P

机构信息

Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2007;24(1):41-52. doi: 10.1002/da.20209.

Abstract

Duloxetine has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) at a dose of 60 mg/day (given once daily). Whereas the target dose for the majority of patients is 60 mg/day, higher duloxetine doses (up to 120 mg/day) have been studied using a twice-daily dosing schedule. To further investigate the pharmacological profile of duloxetine within a once-daily dosing regimen at doses above 60 mg, we examined the safety and tolerability of duloxetine during a dose escalation from 60 mg/day to 120 mg/day. This single-arm, non-placebo-controlled study incorporated a 7-week dose escalation phase, in which patients and investigators were blinded as to timing of dose increases, followed by an open-label extension phase of up to 2 years duration. Patients (age >or=18 years) meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD (n=128) received placebo for 1 week, followed by duloxetine (60 mg/day) titrated after 1 week to 90 mg/day, and after a further week to 120 mg/day. The dose of 120 mg/day was then maintained for 4 weeks. The extension phase comprised an initial 6-week dose stabilization period, during which duloxetine was tapered to the lowest effective dose, followed by continuation therapy at the stabilized dose. We assessed safety using spontaneously reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), laboratory analytes, and visual analogue scales (VAS) for gastrointestinal (GI) disturbance. Efficacy measures included the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) total score, the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scales, and VAS assessments of pain severity and interference. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events during the acute phase of the study was 15.6%. The most frequently reported TEAEs were nausea, headache, dry mouth, dizziness, and decreased appetite. The majority of TEAEs were associated with initial duloxetine dosing; further escalations in dose produced few additional adverse events. VAS measures of GI disturbance worsened significantly compared with baseline values after 1 week of duloxetine treatment. Subsequent assessments of GI disturbance, following dose escalation to 90 mg/day and 120 mg/day, showed either no significant difference or a significant improvement from baseline. Significant improvements (P<.001) were observed in all assessed depression efficacy measures, and in five of six VAS pain outcomes, during acute phase treatment. During 2 years of extension phase therapy, the rate of discontinuation due to adverse events was 11.9%, and the only TEAEs reported by >10% of patients were upper respiratory tract infection (13.1%), headache (10.7%), and insomnia (10.7%). Mean changes from baseline to the end of the extension phase in supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 3.8 and 0.5 mm Hg, respectively, and there were no reports of sustained hypertension. Mean increase in heart rate was 5.9 bpm, while patients exhibited a mean weight increase of 3.1 kg over 2 years of treatment. Results from this study suggest that rapid dose escalation of duloxetine (60 mg/day --> 90 mg/day --> 120 mg/day) is safe and tolerable. Despite weekly escalation, the majority of adverse events were mild and transient and occurred in the first week of duloxetine dosing (at 60 mg once daily). Long-term treatment at a stabilized duloxetine dose was associated with a relatively low incidence of TEAEs and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Time course profiles of body weight and heart rate showed modest increases during 2 years of treatment [ClinicalTrials.gov number, NC T000 42575].

摘要

度洛西汀已被证明在剂量为60毫克/天(每日一次给药)时对治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)有效。虽然大多数患者的目标剂量是60毫克/天,但已使用每日两次给药方案研究了更高的度洛西汀剂量(高达120毫克/天)。为了进一步研究度洛西汀在每日一次给药方案中60毫克以上剂量时的药理学特征,我们在剂量从60毫克/天逐步增加到120毫克/天的过程中检查了度洛西汀的安全性和耐受性。这项单臂、非安慰剂对照研究包括一个为期7周的剂量递增阶段,在此阶段患者和研究人员对剂量增加的时间不知情,随后是长达2年的开放标签延长期。符合DSM-IV标准的MDD患者(年龄≥18岁,n = 128)接受1周的安慰剂治疗,随后在第1周后将度洛西汀(60毫克/天)滴定至90毫克/天,并在再过1周后滴定至120毫克/天。然后将120毫克/天的剂量维持4周。延长期包括最初6周的剂量稳定期,在此期间度洛西汀逐渐减量至最低有效剂量,随后以稳定剂量继续治疗。我们使用自发报告的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)、生命体征变化、心电图(ECG)、实验室分析物以及胃肠道(GI)紊乱的视觉模拟量表(VAS)来评估安全性。疗效指标包括17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D-17)总分、临床总体严重程度印象(CGI-S)和患者总体改善印象(PGI-I)量表,以及疼痛严重程度和干扰的VAS评估。研究急性期因不良事件导致的停药率为15.6%。最常报告的TEAE是恶心、头痛、口干、头晕和食欲减退。大多数TEAE与度洛西汀初始给药有关;剂量进一步增加产生的额外不良事件很少。度洛西汀治疗1周后,GI紊乱的VAS测量值与基线值相比显著恶化。在剂量增加到90毫克/天和120毫克/天后对GI紊乱的后续评估显示,与基线相比无显著差异或有显著改善。在急性期治疗期间,所有评估的抑郁疗效指标以及六个VAS疼痛结果中的五个均观察到显著改善(P <.001)。在2年的延长期治疗中,因不良事件导致的停药率为11.9%,超过10%的患者报告的唯一TEAE是上呼吸道感染(13.1%)、头痛(10.7%)和失眠(10.7%)。从基线到延长期结束时,仰卧位收缩压和舒张压的平均变化分别为3.8和0.5毫米汞柱,没有持续高血压的报告。心率平均增加5.9次/分钟,而患者在2年的治疗中体重平均增加3.1千克。这项研究的结果表明度洛西汀快速剂量递增(60毫克/天→90毫克/天→120毫克/天)是安全且可耐受的。尽管每周递增剂量,但大多数不良事件是轻微且短暂的,发生在度洛西汀给药的第一周(每日60毫克)。以稳定的度洛西汀剂量进行长期治疗与TEAE的发生率相对较低以及因不良事件导致的治疗停药相关。在2年的治疗期间,体重和心率的时间进程曲线显示有适度增加[ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT00042575]

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验