Foster Paul S, Hogan Simon P, Yang Ming, Mattes Joerg, Young Ian G, Matthaei Klaus I, Kumar Rakesh K, Mahalingam Surendran, Webb Dianne C
Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia.
Trends Mol Med. 2002 Apr;8(4):162-7. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(02)02302-x.
Extensive clinical investigations have implicated eosinophils in the pathogenesis of asthma. In a recent clinical trial, humanized monoclonal antibody to interleukin (IL)-5 significantly limited eosinophil migration to the lung. However, treatment did not affect the development of the late-phase response or airways hyperresponsiveness in experimental asthma. Although IL-5 is a key regulator of eosinophilia and attenuation of its actions without signs of clinical improvement raises questions about the contribution of these cells to disease, further studies are warranted to define the effects of anti-IL-5 in the processes that lead to chronic asthma. Furthermore, eosinophil accumulation into allergic tissues should not be viewed as a process that is exclusively regulated by IL-5 but one in which IL-5 greatly contributes. Indeed, data on anti-IL-5 treatments (human and animal models) are confounded by the failure of this approach to completely resolve tissue eosinophilia and the belief that IL-5 alone is the critical molecular switch for eosinophil development and migration. The contribution of these IL-5-independent pathways should be considered when assessing the role of eosinophils in disease processes.
广泛的临床研究表明嗜酸性粒细胞参与了哮喘的发病机制。在最近的一项临床试验中,抗白细胞介素(IL)-5人源化单克隆抗体显著限制了嗜酸性粒细胞向肺部的迁移。然而,该治疗并未影响实验性哮喘中迟发反应或气道高反应性的发展。尽管IL-5是嗜酸性粒细胞增多的关键调节因子,且其作用减弱却无临床改善迹象,这引发了关于这些细胞对疾病贡献的疑问,但仍需进一步研究来确定抗IL-5在导致慢性哮喘的过程中的作用。此外,嗜酸性粒细胞在过敏组织中的积聚不应被视为仅由IL-5调节的过程,而是IL-5在其中起很大作用的过程。事实上,抗IL-5治疗(人体和动物模型)的数据因该方法未能完全消除组织嗜酸性粒细胞增多以及认为IL-5是嗜酸性粒细胞发育和迁移的关键分子开关的观点而变得复杂。在评估嗜酸性粒细胞在疾病过程中的作用时,应考虑这些不依赖IL-5的途径的贡献。