Hoge Michael A, Tebes Jacob Kraemer, Davidson Larry, Griffith Ezra E H
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2002;30(1):49-58; discussion 59-64.
Class action suits frequently have been used as a strategy for improving the quality of mental health care. Psychiatrists, psychologists, and professionals from related disciplines have been involved in these suits in different roles. This article presents and discusses case examples of these roles, which include the expert witness, court-appointed expert, consulting expert, monitor, special master, receiver, advocate, amicus curiae, plaintiff, and defendant. The authors caution against assuming dual roles and argue that professionals, before beginning to participate in this complex arena, should clarify their functional responsibilities, the legal basis of their involvement, and the ethics principles that will guide their actions.
集体诉讼经常被用作提高精神卫生保健质量的一种策略。精神病医生、心理学家以及相关学科的专业人员在这些诉讼中扮演着不同的角色。本文介绍并讨论了这些角色的案例,其中包括专家证人、法院指定专家、咨询专家、监督人、特别主事官、接管人、倡导者、法庭之友、原告和被告。作者告诫不要承担双重角色,并认为专业人员在开始参与这个复杂的领域之前,应该明确自己的职能责任、参与的法律依据以及指导其行动的伦理原则。