Sluijs E M, Bennema-Broos M, Wagner C
Afdeling Kwaliteit en Organisatie, Nederlands instituut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidszorg (Nivel), Postbus 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2002 Jan;109(1):20-4.
In 1998 mutual practice visitation has been introduced in the Dutch dental practice as a method to improve quality of dental care. The method is called 'mutual visitation' because groups of three dentists visit and evaluate each others practices. An independent research institute (Nivel) investigated the perceived effects, advantages and barriers of visitation. A postal questionnaire was sent to all 235 dentists who, by that time, participated in visitation. The response was 57%. The results showed that the effects reported most frequently were: a more critical attitude to dental practice, more insight into practices of colleagues and actual improvements in dental care. The majority of the respondents considered visitation suitable to improve practice-organization. A minority considered visitation suitable to increase professional expertise. The mutuality of the visitation was highly valued by the participants. The main disadvantage of visitation appeared to be the time investment (a mean of three days per dentist). In general, the respondents held the view that the positive effects outweighed the time and efforts, however, many dentists regretted the lack of financial compensation for visitation.
1998年,相互实践访问被引入荷兰牙科诊所,作为提高牙科护理质量的一种方法。这种方法被称为“相互访问”,因为由三名牙医组成的小组会访问并评估彼此的诊所。一家独立的研究机构(Nivel)调查了访问的感知效果、优势和障碍。向当时参与访问的所有235名牙医发送了一份邮政调查问卷。回复率为57%。结果显示,最常报告的效果是:对牙科实践有更批判性的态度,对同事的实践有更多了解,以及牙科护理的实际改善。大多数受访者认为访问适合改善实践组织。少数人认为访问适合提高专业技能。参与者高度重视访问的相互性。访问的主要缺点似乎是时间投入(每位牙医平均三天)。总体而言,受访者认为积极效果超过了时间和精力,然而,许多牙医对访问缺乏经济补偿感到遗憾。