Suppr超能文献

[家庭医生何时以及如何准确识别广泛性焦虑症和抑郁症?]

[When and how well does the family physician recognize generalized anxiety disorders and depressions?].

作者信息

Hoyer I, Krause P, Höfler M, Beesdo K, Wittchen H U

机构信息

Institut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie der TU Dresden.

出版信息

Fortschr Med Orig. 2001;119 Suppl 1:26-35.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recognition rates for generalized anxiety disorder (GAS) and depression in primary care and its predictors are reported.

METHODS

Based on the results of GAD-P study screening questionnaires, the investigators evaluated how many patients were correctly classified by primary care physicians a) as cases with mental disorders and b) as specific disorder cases. Socio-demographic and illness history variables of patients as well as features of physicians were analyzed as predictors of recognition by regression analyzes.

RESULTS

Physicians recognized a mental disorder in more than two thirds of cases with GAS; rates were even higher in patients with comorbid anxiety and depression (85.4%). Recognition of the specific disorder was conspicuously worse in patients with GAS (34.4%) in comparison with patients with depression (64.3%). Only the variables of patients' demographic status and illness (e.g. higher age or, negatively, incident GAS) predicted recognition of a mental disorder.

CONCLUSION

Generalized anxiety is often recognized as a mental disorder but seldom as the specific diagnosis of GAS. This is especially true for patients without a history of mental disorders (incident cases). Suggestions for a better recognition are discussed in the light of specific psychopharmacologic and psychotherapeutic treatment demands. The risks of chronicity of this disorder as well as the ascertained predictors of good recognition are also discussed.

摘要

背景

报告了初级保健中广泛性焦虑症(GAS)和抑郁症的识别率及其预测因素。

方法

基于广泛性焦虑症-初级保健(GAD-P)研究筛查问卷的结果,研究人员评估了初级保健医生将多少患者正确分类为:a)精神障碍病例;b)特定障碍病例。通过回归分析,分析了患者的社会人口统计学和疾病史变量以及医生的特征,作为识别的预测因素。

结果

医生在超过三分之二的广泛性焦虑症病例中识别出精神障碍;在合并焦虑和抑郁的患者中识别率甚至更高(85.4%)。与抑郁症患者(64.3%)相比,广泛性焦虑症患者对特定障碍的识别明显更差(34.4%)。只有患者的人口统计学状况和疾病变量(如年龄较大或,负面地,新发广泛性焦虑症)预测了对精神障碍的识别。

结论

广泛性焦虑症常被识别为精神障碍,但很少被明确诊断为广泛性焦虑症。对于没有精神障碍病史的患者(新发病例)尤其如此。根据特定的心理药理学和心理治疗需求,讨论了更好识别的建议。还讨论了该障碍的慢性风险以及确定的良好识别预测因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验