Romero J J, Perez E, Dolz G, Frankena K
Programa de Investigación en Medicina Poblacional, Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica, P.O. Box 304-3000, Heredia, Costa Rica.
Prev Vet Med. 2002 Apr 15;53(4):263-73. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(01)00290-2.
Twenty-five specialised Costa Rican dairy farms (located in the Poás area) were used to determine neosporosis seroprevalence and the association of seropositivity with environmental and management factors. The farms involved were selected intentionally and all of them use VAMPP 5.1 (Veterinary Automated Management and Production Control Programme) as management-information system. Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and crosses between them were the most-frequent breeds in these herds. The number of females per farm varied from 41 to 296. Our cross-sectional study had two phases. In the first phase, we determined the presence or absence of seropositivity at herd level. For the second phase, all females in 20 seropositive farms were bled. Serum samples were tested for antibodies to Neospora caninum using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A questionnaire with factors mentioned in the literature was administered to the farmers. Logistic regression (LR with herd as random effect) was used to assess the relationships of the serostatus at the individual level with characteristics of the cows and environmental factors. In the first phase all herds had >20% seropositive females; therefore, all herds were eligible for the second phase. In the second phase, the overall prevalence was 39.7% (1191/3002), and within-herd prevalences were between 25.0 and 70.5%. Age 3-6 years, parity < or =2 of the dam of the cow, Jersey breed and lack of purposive sampling to diagnose abortive infectious disease were associated with positive serostatus; other management and environmental factors did not show significant associations. The lack of association between management and environmental factors with serostatus might be because all farms were exposed to a considerable number of potential factors. That all herds of this study were seropositive for neosporosis and the within-herd prevalence was considerable raises questions about how far the infection is spread in other dairy areas of Costa Rica.
二十五个专门的哥斯达黎加奶牛场(位于波阿斯地区)被用于确定新孢子虫病的血清阳性率以及血清阳性与环境和管理因素之间的关联。所涉及的农场是有意挑选的,并且所有农场都使用VAMPP 5.1(兽医自动化管理与生产控制程序)作为管理信息系统。荷斯坦-弗里生牛、泽西牛以及它们之间的杂交品种是这些牛群中最常见的品种。每个农场的母牛数量从41头到296头不等。我们的横断面研究有两个阶段。在第一阶段,我们确定牛群水平上血清阳性的存在与否。在第二阶段,对20个血清阳性农场的所有母牛进行采血。使用间接酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血清样本中抗犬新孢子虫的抗体。向农民发放了一份包含文献中提到的因素的问卷。使用逻辑回归(以牛群为随机效应)来评估个体水平上的血清状态与奶牛特征和环境因素之间的关系。在第一阶段,所有牛群中血清阳性的母牛比例都超过了20%;因此,所有牛群都符合进入第二阶段的条件。在第二阶段,总体患病率为39.7%(1191/3002),牛群内患病率在25.0%至70.5%之间。3至6岁、母牛之母的胎次≤2、泽西牛品种以及缺乏用于诊断流产传染病的针对性采样与血清阳性状态相关;其他管理和环境因素未显示出显著关联。管理和环境因素与血清状态之间缺乏关联可能是因为所有农场都暴露于大量潜在因素。本研究中所有牛群新孢子虫病血清均为阳性且牛群内患病率较高,这引发了关于该感染在哥斯达黎加其他奶牛养殖地区传播程度的疑问。