Hurkmans Coen W, Cho B C John, Damen Eugene, Zijp Lambert, Mijnheer Ben J
Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Radiother Oncol. 2002 Feb;62(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00473-x.
The main purpose of this work is to reduce the cardiac and lung dose by applying conformal tangential beam irradiation of the intact left breast with and without intensity modulation, instead of rectangular tangential treatment fields. The extension of the applicability of the maximum heart distance (MHD) to conformal tangential fields as a simple patient selection criterion, identifying patients for which rectangular and conformal tangential fields without intensity modulation will result in unacceptable normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values for late cardiac mortality (e.g. >2%), was also investigated.
Three-dimensional treatment planning was performed for 17 left-sided breast cancer patients. Three different tangential beam techniques were compared: (1) optimized wedges without blocks, (2) optimized wedges with conformal blocks and (3) intensity modulation. Plans were evaluated using dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the planning target volume (PTV), the heart and the lungs. NTCPs for radiation pneumonitis and late cardiac mortality were calculated using the DVH data. The MHD was measured for all rectangular (MHD(rectangular)) and conformal (MHD(conformal)) treatment plans.
For all patients, on average, part of the PTV receiving a dose between 95 and 107% of the prescribed dose of 50Gy in 25 fractions of 2Gy was 90.8% (standard deviation (SD): 5.0%), 92.8% (SD: 3.5%) and 92.8% (SD: 3.6%) for the intensity modulation radiation therapy (IMRT), conformal and rectangular field treatment techniques, respectively. The NTCP for radiation pneumonitis was 0.3% (SD: 0.1%), 0.4% (SD: 0.4%) and 0.5% (SD: 0.6%) for the IMRT, conformal and rectangular field techniques, respectively. The NTCP for late cardiac mortality was 5.9% (SD: 2.2%) for the rectangular field technique. This value was reduced to 4.0% (SD: 2.3%) with the conformal technique. A further reduction to 2.0% (SD: 1.1%) could be accomplished with the IMRT technique. The NTCP for late cardiac mortality could be described as a second order polynomial function of the MHD. This function could be described with a high accuracy and was independent of the technique for which the MHD was determined (r(2)=0.88). In order to achieve a NTCP value for late cardiac mortality below 1, 2 or 3%, the MHD should be equal to or smaller than 11, 17 or 23 mm, respectively. If such a maximum complication probability cannot be accomplished, a treatment using the IMRT technique should be considered.
The use of conformal tangential fields decreases the NTCP for late cardiac toxicity on average by 30% compared to using rectangular fields, while the tangential IMRT technique can further reduce this value by an additional 50%. The MHD can be used to estimate the NTCP for late cardiac mortality if rectangular or conformal tangential treatment fields are used.
本研究的主要目的是通过应用完整左乳的适形切线束照射(有或无强度调制)而非矩形切线治疗野,来降低心脏和肺部剂量。还研究了将最大心脏距离(MHD)作为一种简单的患者选择标准应用于适形切线野的适用性,以识别那些使用矩形和无强度调制的适形切线野会导致晚期心脏死亡率的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)值不可接受(例如>2%)的患者。
对17例左侧乳腺癌患者进行三维治疗计划。比较了三种不同的切线束技术:(1)无挡块的优化楔形板,(2)有适形挡块的优化楔形板,(3)强度调制。使用剂量体积直方图(DVH)对计划靶体积(PTV)、心脏和肺部进行计划评估。使用DVH数据计算放射性肺炎和晚期心脏死亡率的NTCP。对所有矩形(MHD(rectangular))和适形(MHD(conformal))治疗计划测量MHD。
对于所有患者,平均而言,接受25次2Gy分割的规定剂量50Gy的95%至107%剂量的PTV部分,强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)、适形和矩形野治疗技术分别为90.8%(标准差(SD):5.0%)、92.8%(SD:3.5%)和92.8%(SD:3.6%)。放射性肺炎的NTCP,IMRT、适形和矩形野技术分别为0.3%(SD:0.1%)、0.4%(SD:0.4%)和0.5%(SD:0.6%)。矩形野技术的晚期心脏死亡率NTCP为5.9%(SD:2.2%)。采用适形技术时,该值降至4.0%(SD:2.3%)。采用IMRT技术可进一步降至2.0%(SD:1.1%)。晚期心脏死亡率的NTCP可描述为MHD的二阶多项式函数。该函数可以高精度描述,且与确定MHD所采用的技术无关(r(2)=0.88)。为使晚期心脏死亡率的NTCP值低于1%、2%或3%,MHD应分别等于或小于11mm、17mm或23mm。如果无法实现这样的最大并发症概率,则应考虑采用IMRT技术进行治疗。
与使用矩形野相比,使用适形切线野平均可使晚期心脏毒性的NTCP降低30%,而切线IMRT技术可再将该值额外降低50%。如果使用矩形或适形切线治疗野,MHD可用于估计晚期心脏死亡率的NTCP。