Azuma Hiroshi, Yamada Yoshiko, Shibuya-Fujiwara Nobuko, Yamaguchi Miki, Murahashi Hideaki, Fujihara Mitsuhiro, Sato Norihiro, Fukazawa Keiko, Ikebuchi Kenji, Ikeda Hisami
Hokkaido Red Cross Blood Center, Yamanote 2-2 Nishi-ku, Sapporo 063-0002, Japan.
Exp Hematol. 2002 Apr;30(4):346-51. doi: 10.1016/s0301-472x(02)00776-2.
To examine the possibility of adoptive cellular immunotherapy such as donor lymphocyte infusion using ex vivo expanded cord blood (CBL) lymphocytes, the potential expansion ability of CBL lymphocytes and the function of expanded CBL lymphocytes were evaluated.
Mononuclear cell fractions derived from CBL or peripheral blood (PBL) were placed in anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody-coated flasks and cultured in the presence of recombinant human interleukin-2 for 4 days. Cells then were transferred to noncoated flasks and cultured for another 2 weeks. On day 14, polyclonality, cell surface markers, killer activity, and intracellular cytokine profiles were evaluated.
Cells were polyclonally expanded. The differences in cumulative fold expansion on day 14 between CBL [1174 +/- 637 (292-1939), n = 6] and PBL [1247 +/- 568 (517-2328), n = 9] were not significant (p = 0.95). Phenotypic patterns of both expanded CBL and PBL were similar. CD4/CD8 ratio of expanded CBL appeared to remain greater than 1 on day 8. In contrast, that of expanded PBL became less than 1. In both cases, approximately 20% of cells had the CD3(+)CD8(+)CD56(+) phenotype. At an effector to target ratio (E/T) of 40:1, the natural killer activity of expanded CBL (64.5% +/- 10.8%, n = 9) was significantly higher than that of expanded PBL (48.3% +/- 16.8%, n = 9) (p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test). However, there was no significant difference in lymphokine-activated killer activity between expanded CBL (45.3% +/- 25.2%, n = 7) and expanded PBL (67.2% +/- 12.3%, n = 7). Interferon-gamma-producing cells were dominant in both cases.
It was feasible to achieve approximately 1000-fold expansion of CBL, and the phenotype and function of expanded CBLs were essentially equivalent to those of expanded PBL. This suggested that ex vivo expanded CBL may be applied to adoptive cellular immunotherapy such as donor lymphocyte infusion.
为了研究过继性细胞免疫疗法(如使用体外扩增的脐血(CBL)淋巴细胞进行供者淋巴细胞输注)的可能性,评估了CBL淋巴细胞的潜在扩增能力以及扩增后的CBL淋巴细胞的功能。
将来源于CBL或外周血(PBL)的单核细胞组分置于抗CD3单克隆抗体包被的培养瓶中,并在重组人白细胞介素-2存在的情况下培养4天。然后将细胞转移至未包被的培养瓶中再培养2周。在第14天,评估细胞的多克隆性、细胞表面标志物、杀伤活性和细胞内细胞因子谱。
细胞实现了多克隆扩增。CBL组[1174±637(292 - 1939),n = 6]和PBL组[1247±568(517 - 2328),n = 9]在第14天的累积扩增倍数差异无统计学意义(p = 0.95)。扩增后的CBL和PBL的表型模式相似。扩增后的CBL在第8天的CD4/CD8比值似乎仍大于1。相比之下,扩增后的PBL的CD4/CD8比值则小于1。在两种情况下,约20%的细胞具有CD3(+)CD8(+)CD56(+)表型。在效应细胞与靶细胞比例(E/T)为40:1时,扩增后的CBL的自然杀伤活性(64.5%±10.8%,n = 9)显著高于扩增后的PBL(48.3%±16.8%,n = 9)(p < 0.01,Mann-Whitney U检验)。然而,扩增后的CBL(45.3%±25.2%,n = 7)和扩增后的PBL(67.2%±12.3%,n = 7)之间的淋巴因子激活的杀伤活性无显著差异。两种情况下产生干扰素-γ的细胞均占主导。
实现CBL约1000倍的扩增是可行的,扩增后的CBL的表型和功能与扩增后的PBL基本相当。这表明体外扩增的CBL可应用于过继性细胞免疫疗法,如供者淋巴细胞输注。