Suppr超能文献

理论误差对颈动脉狭窄双功超声分级中速度估计及准确性的影响。

The impact of theoretical errors on velocity estimation and accuracy of duplex grading of carotid stenosis.

作者信息

Thomas Nicholas, Taylor Peter, Padayachee Soundrie

机构信息

Ultrasonic Angiology Laboratory, Department of Radiological Sciences, Guy's Campus, King's College London, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002 Feb;28(2):191-6. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00498-7.

Abstract

Two potential errors in velocity estimation, Doppler angle misalignment and intrinsic spectral broadening (ISB), were determined and used to correct recorded blood velocities obtained from 20 patients (38 bifurcations). The recorded and corrected velocities were used to grade stenoses of greater than 70% using two duplex classification schemes. The first scheme used a peak systolic velocity (PSV) of > 250 cm/s in the internal carotid artery (ICA), and the second a PSV ratio of > 3.4 (ICA PSV/common carotid artery PSV). The "gold standard" was digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The maximum error in velocity estimation due to Doppler angle misalignment was 33 cm/s, but this did not alter sensitivity of stenosis detection. ISB correction caused a reduction in PSV that decreased the sensitivity of the PSV scheme from 65% to 45%. The PSV ratio classification was not affected by ISB errors. Centres using a PSV criterion for grading stenosis should use a fixed Doppler angle and should establish velocity thresholds in-house.

摘要

确定了速度估计中的两个潜在误差,即多普勒角度失准和固有频谱展宽(ISB),并将其用于校正从20例患者(38个分叉处)获取的记录血流速度。使用两种双功超声分类方案,将记录的和校正后的速度用于对大于70%的狭窄进行分级。第一种方案使用颈内动脉(ICA)的收缩期峰值速度(PSV)>250 cm/s,第二种方案使用PSV比值>3.4(ICA PSV/颈总动脉PSV)。“金标准”是数字减影血管造影(DSA)。由于多普勒角度失准导致的速度估计最大误差为33 cm/s,但这并未改变狭窄检测的敏感性。ISB校正导致PSV降低,使PSV方案的敏感性从65%降至45%。PSV比值分类不受ISB误差的影响。使用PSV标准对狭窄进行分级的中心应使用固定的多普勒角度,并应在内部确定速度阈值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验