Haddad Peter M., Benbow Susan M.
Department of Psychiatry, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, England.
Convuls Ther. 1993;9(2):101-107.
Opinion of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and ECT-related psychiatric knowledge among anesthetists working in the North Western Health Region of England were investigated; 261 anesthetists returned usable questionnaires. The majority were in favor of ECT for patients as recommended by psychiatrists, and possessed a reasonable knowledge base about related psychiatric issues. A minority were opposed to the use of ECT, lacked rudimentary psychiatric knowledge and held negative misconceptions. Although this does not compromise anesthetic ability, it may have adverse consequences. In particular anesthetists may not appreciate the importance of their role in ECT and may be reluctant to become involved in ECT clinics and research. Attitude and knowledge did not differ significantly when respondents with extensive and recent ECT experience were compared with the remainder. Two thirds of respondents favored anesthetic training including more information about psychiatric aspects of ECT. We recommend improved liasion between anesthetists and psychiatrists during training and in clinical practice.
对在英格兰西北部卫生区域工作的麻醉师关于电休克疗法(ECT)及与ECT相关的精神病学知识的观点进行了调查;261名麻醉师返回了可用问卷。大多数人赞成按照精神科医生的建议对患者使用ECT,并且拥有关于相关精神病学问题的合理知识基础。少数人反对使用ECT,缺乏基本的精神病学知识且持有负面误解。虽然这不会损害麻醉能力,但可能会产生不良后果。特别是麻醉师可能没有意识到他们在ECT中角色的重要性,并且可能不愿意参与ECT诊所和研究。将有丰富和近期ECT经验的受访者与其余受访者进行比较时,态度和知识没有显著差异。三分之二的受访者赞成进行麻醉培训,包括更多关于ECT精神科方面的信息。我们建议在培训期间以及临床实践中改善麻醉师与精神科医生之间的联络。