Insua Alvaro, Massari Fabio, Rodríguez Moncalvo Juan José, Rubén Zanchetta José, Insua Ana María
Instituto de Investigaciones Metabólicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Endocr Pract. 2002 Mar-Apr;8(2):96-101. doi: 10.4158/EP.8.2.96.
To compare the hypolipidemic effects of gemfibrozil and micronized fenofibrate in patients with primary hyperlipoproteinemia, phenotypes IIa and IIb, with emphasis on their cholesterol-lowering effectiveness.
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study was performed to assess the effects of gemfibrozil (900 mg) and micronized fenofibrate (200 mg), administered once daily, to 21 patients (45 to 70 years old)-16 with type IIa and 5 with type IIb primary hyperlipidemia. The two treatment periods lasted 6 weeks each; the run-in and washout periods were 4 weeks.
Both drugs significantly reduced total cholesterol, calculated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, and fibrinogen (P<0.01 for all calculations, except P<0.05 for fibrinogen with gemfibrozil therapy) and increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (P<0.01). Neither drug affected Lp(a) lipoprotein, whereas uric acid was reduced only by fenofibrate (P<0.01). The percentage decrease in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol was greater with fenofibrate than with gemfibrozil (-22% versus -15%, P<0.02; and -27% versus -16%, P<0.02, respectively). In contrast, reductions in levels of triglycerides (-54% versus -46.5%), apolipoprotein B, and fibrinogen, as well as the increase in HDL (+9% for both drugs), showed no significant difference between treatments. Separate analysis of patients with type IIb hyperlipoproteinemia showed essentially the same plasma lipid changes as for the overall group, but with greater modifications in triglyceride and HDL concentrations.
Fenofibrate and gemfibrozil induced similar variations from baseline values in triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and fibrinogen, but the decreases in total and LDL cholesterol levels were greater with fenofibrate, in this group of patients with primary hyperlipidemia.
比较吉非贝齐和微粒化非诺贝特对原发性IIa型和IIb型高脂蛋白血症患者的降血脂作用,重点关注其降低胆固醇的有效性。
进行了一项随机、双盲、双模拟、交叉研究,以评估吉非贝齐(900毫克)和微粒化非诺贝特(200毫克)每日一次给药对21例患者(45至70岁)的影响,其中16例为IIa型原发性高脂血症,5例为IIb型原发性高脂血症。两个治疗期各持续6周;导入期和洗脱期均为4周。
两种药物均显著降低总胆固醇、计算得出的低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇、甘油三酯、载脂蛋白B和纤维蛋白原(所有计算P<0.01,但吉非贝齐治疗纤维蛋白原的计算P<0.05),并升高高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇(P<0.01)。两种药物均不影响Lp(a)脂蛋白,而仅非诺贝特可降低尿酸(P<0.01)。非诺贝特使总胆固醇和LDL胆固醇降低的百分比大于吉非贝齐(分别为-22%对-15%,P<0.02;-27%对-16%,P<0.02)。相比之下,甘油三酯水平降低(-54%对-46.5%)、载脂蛋白B和纤维蛋白原降低以及HDL升高(两种药物均为+9%)在治疗之间无显著差异。对IIb型高脂蛋白血症患者的单独分析显示,血浆脂质变化与总体组基本相同,但甘油三酯和HDL浓度的变化更大。
在这组原发性高脂血症患者中,非诺贝特和吉非贝齐使甘油三酯、HDL胆固醇、载脂蛋白B和纤维蛋白原相对于基线值产生相似变化,但非诺贝特使总胆固醇和LDL胆固醇水平降低幅度更大。