Babault Nicolas, Pousson Michel, Michaut Anne, Ballay Yves, Hoecke Jacques Van
Groupe Analyse du Mouvement (GAM), Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Université de Bourgogne, BP 27877, 21078 Dijon Cedex, France.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Apr;86(6):541-7. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0579-3. Epub 2002 Mar 7.
This study was designed to re-examine and compare the neural drive of the knee extensors during isokinetic concentric muscular actions by means of the twitch interpolation technique (activation level, AL) and surface electromyographic (EMG) recordings (root mean square, RMS). Torque, AL and RMS amplitudes of three knee extensors and one knee flexor were measured in nine subjects during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary contractions, performed under concentric (60 degrees.s(-1) and 120 degrees.s(-1); Con60 and Con120, respectively) and isometric (Iso) conditions. Mean (SD) maximal voluntary torque was significantly lower ( P<0.01) during concentric contractions [Con60: 208.6 (26.8) Nm and Con120: 184.7 (26.4) Nm] compared with isometric contractions [327.4 (52.0) Nm]. A significantly lower AL ( P<0.05) was recorded during Con60 [80.9 (8.8)%] compared with Iso [87.9 (5.1)%] and Con120 [88.2 (6.6)%] maximal contractions. Simultaneously, a lower knee extensor average RMS amplitudes (av.RMS) was measured during Con60 maximal contractions compared with Iso and Con120 maximal contractions. The antagonist biceps femoris RMS values were not different between maximal Iso, Con60 and Con120 contractions. During sub-maximal voluntary contractions, the RMS/torque relationships were similar whatever the muscle considered (vastus lateralis, vastus medialis or rectus femoris) and the AL/av.RMS relationships did not reveal any noticeable differences between each contractile condition. The results of the present study indicate that av.RMS and AL describe similarly the neural drive during maximal and sub-maximal efforts and indicate that during maximal voluntary efforts, neural drive is dependent upon concentric angular velocity (up to 120 degrees.s(-1)). Thus, our results suggest that when applying different contractile conditions, the torque output is regulated via complex interactions between intrinsic muscular properties and the neural drive.
本研究旨在通过抽搐插值技术(激活水平,AL)和表面肌电图(EMG)记录(均方根,RMS),重新审视并比较等速向心肌肉动作期间膝伸肌的神经驱动。在九名受试者进行最大和次最大自主收缩期间,测量了三块膝伸肌和一块膝屈肌的扭矩、AL和RMS幅度,收缩在向心(分别为60°·s⁻¹和120°·s⁻¹;分别为Con60和Con120)和等长(Iso)条件下进行。与等长收缩[327.4(52.0)Nm]相比,向心收缩期间[Con60:208.6(26.8)Nm和Con120:184.7(26.4)Nm]的平均(SD)最大自主扭矩显著更低(P<0.01)。与Iso[87.9(5.1)%]和Con120[88.2(6.6)%]最大收缩相比,Con60期间记录到显著更低的AL(P<0.05)[80.9(8.8)%]。同时,与Iso和Con120最大收缩相比,Con60最大收缩期间测量到更低的膝伸肌平均RMS幅度(av.RMS)。在最大Iso、Con60和Con120收缩之间,拮抗肌股二头肌的RMS值没有差异。在次最大自主收缩期间,无论考虑哪块肌肉(股外侧肌、股内侧肌或股直肌),RMS/扭矩关系都相似,并且AL/av.RMS关系在每种收缩条件之间未显示出任何明显差异。本研究结果表明,av.RMS和AL在最大和次最大努力期间对神经驱动的描述相似,并表明在最大自主努力期间,神经驱动取决于向心角速度(高达120°·s⁻¹)。因此,我们的结果表明,当应用不同的收缩条件时,扭矩输出是通过内在肌肉特性和神经驱动之间的复杂相互作用来调节的。