Homma Yukio, Ando Takashi, Yoshida Masaki, Kageyama Shinji, Takei Mineo, Kimoto Kosuke, Ishizuka Osamu, Gotoh Momokazu, Hashimoto Tatsuru
Department of Urology, Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):204-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.10016.
Frequencies of voiding and urinary incontinence are commonly measured by a patient's recall or a diary. The recommended diary length varies from 1 to 14 days, with 7 days apparently being most common. To examine the statistical precision of these different modalities, we analyzed recall data and diary data of 74 patients with urinary frequency, incontinence, or both. Recall data on voiding and incontinence frequency were systematically higher and more variable than diary data. Longer diary length provided less variable diary data. The confidence interval of diary data was calculated by applying the normal distribution to daytime voiding frequency and the Poisson distribution to daytime incontinence frequency. For daytime voiding frequency, the 95% confidence interval was estimated to be (x - 2.65, x + 2.65) (x - 1.53, x + 1.53) (x - 1, x + 1), where x is the 1-day, 3-day, and 7-day diary mean, respectively. For daytime incontinence frequency, the confidence interval depended on both the diary length and the diary mean. It was estimated to be (0, 6.39), (1.72, 4.28), (2.36, 3.64), by using a diary mean of 3 or 1-day, 7-day, and 28-day diaries, respectively. Also, it was estimated to be (0, 1.02), (1.72, 4.28), (7.66, 12.34), when the 7-day diary mean was 0.5, 3, and 10, respectively. Studies with different samples of genuine stress incontinence (n = 37) and urge incontinence (n = 25) confirmed these results. In conclusion, we believe the 7-day diary is highly reliable for estimating voiding frequency and is a reasonable option for predicting incontinence episodes. However, the diary length should be extended in a patient with rarer events of incontinence, and it should be shortened for those who are incontinent more often or who are diagnosed with voiding frequency only.
排尿频率和尿失禁情况通常通过患者回忆或日记来测量。推荐的日记记录时长从1天到14天不等,其中7天最为常见。为了研究这些不同方式的统计精度,我们分析了74例有尿频、尿失禁或两者皆有的患者的回忆数据和日记数据。排尿和尿失禁频率的回忆数据系统性地高于日记数据且更具变异性。日记记录时长越长,日记数据的变异性越小。日记数据的置信区间通过将正态分布应用于白天排尿频率,将泊松分布应用于白天尿失禁频率来计算。对于白天排尿频率,95%置信区间估计分别为(x - 2.65, x + 2.65)(x为1天日记均值)、(x - 1.53, x + 1.53)(x为3天日记均值)、(x - 1, x + 1)(x为7天日记均值)。对于白天尿失禁频率,置信区间取决于日记时长和日记均值。分别使用3天或1天、7天、28天日记均值时,估计值为(0, 6.39)、(1.72, 4.28)、(2.36, 3.64)。当7天日记均值分别为0.5、3和10时,估计值分别为(0, 1.02)、(1.72, 4.28)、(7.66, 12.34)。对不同样本的真性压力性尿失禁(n = 37)和急迫性尿失禁(n = 25)的研究证实了这些结果。总之,我们认为7天日记对于估计排尿频率高度可靠,是预测尿失禁发作的合理选择。然而,对于尿失禁事件较少的患者,日记时长应延长;对于尿失禁更频繁或仅被诊断为排尿频率异常的患者,日记时长应缩短。