Wang Jou-Kou, Liau Chau-Song, Huang Juey-Jen, Hsu Kwan-Leh, Lo Ping-Han, Hung Jui-Song, Wu Mei-Hwan, Lee Yuan-Teh
Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Apr;55(4):513-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10090.
We present the short- and intermediate-term results of transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus with Gianturco coils in adolescents and adults. During a 5-year period, 55 patients (44 females, 11 males) with ages ranging from 14 to 72 years (median, 23) underwent attempted transcatheter closure of patent ductus with the Gianturco coils. The diameter of the narrowest segment of the ductus ranged from 0.8 to 7.6 mm (3.9 +/- 1.3 mm). The 55 patients were divided into three groups. Group I consisted of nine patients with a ductal diameter < or = 3 mm, group II consisted of 27 patients with a ductal diameter > 3 mm but < or = 4 mm, and group III consisted of 19 patients with a ductal diameter > 4 mm. Four- to five-loop Gianturco coils were used, which were deployed via retrograde aortic route. Multiple-coil technique was generally applied in group II patients. Balloon occlusion technique in combination with multiple-coil technique was generally used in group III patients. Deployment of coil was successful in 51 patients (93%) but failed in 4. The success rate of coil deployment in group I, II, and III were 100% (9/9), 96% (26/27), and 84% (16/19), respectively. A mean of 1.9 +/- 0.7 coils was deployed per patient. Of the four patients with unsuccessful coil deployment, three underwent surgery and one received implantation with Amplatzer duct occluder. Distal embolization of 21 coils occurred in 10 patients (3 in group II and 7 in group III), from whom 20 coils were retrieved with a gooseneck snare and 1 coil was removed during surgery. The mean diameter of ductus in the 10 patients with distal embolization was significantly larger than that in those without (5.2 +/- 1.4 vs. 3.7 +/- 1.1 mm; P < 0.01). Among the 51 patients with successful coil deployment, immediate complete closure was achieved in 20 (39%), while trivial to mild leak was present in 31 (61%). No significant complications were encountered. After a follow-up period ranging from 5 to 42 months, four patients had a small residual shunt and three underwent a second intervention with complete occlusion. None had left pulmonary artery stenosis documented with Doppler echocardiography. Transcatheter closure of ductus with the Gianturco coils is safe and feasible in the majority of adolescents and adults. Taking high embolization rate in patients with a ductus diameter > 4 mm into consideration, controlled-release coils, Buttoned device, or Amplatzer duct occluder can be a better choice.
我们呈现了应用Gianturco弹簧圈经导管闭合青少年及成人动脉导管未闭的短期和中期结果。在5年期间,55例患者(44例女性,11例男性),年龄范围为14至72岁(中位数为23岁),尝试应用Gianturco弹簧圈经导管闭合动脉导管未闭。动脉导管最窄段直径范围为0.8至7.6mm(3.9±1.3mm)。55例患者被分为三组。第一组包括9例动脉导管直径≤3mm的患者,第二组包括27例动脉导管直径>3mm但≤4mm的患者,第三组包括19例动脉导管直径>4mm的患者。使用四至五环的Gianturco弹簧圈,经逆行主动脉途径置入。第二组患者一般应用多弹簧圈技术。第三组患者一般采用球囊封堵技术联合多弹簧圈技术。51例患者(93%)弹簧圈置入成功,4例失败。第一组、第二组和第三组弹簧圈置入成功率分别为100%(9/9)、96%(26/27)和84%(16/19)。每位患者平均置入1.9±0.7个弹簧圈。在4例弹簧圈置入失败的患者中,3例接受了手术,1例植入了Amplatzer动脉导管封堵器。10例患者(第二组3例,第三组7例)发生了21个弹簧圈的远端栓塞,其中20个弹簧圈用鹅颈圈套取出,1个弹簧圈在手术中取出。10例发生远端栓塞患者的动脉导管平均直径显著大于未发生栓塞患者(5.2±1.4 vs. 3.7±1.1mm;P<0.01)。在51例弹簧圈置入成功的患者中,20例(39%)立即实现完全闭合,31例(61%)存在轻微至轻度分流。未出现严重并发症。在5至42个月的随访期后,4例患者有小的残余分流,3例接受了第二次干预并实现完全封堵。经多普勒超声心动图检查,无一例有左肺动脉狭窄记录。应用Gianturco弹簧圈经导管闭合动脉导管未闭在大多数青少年和成人中是安全可行的。考虑到动脉导管直径>4mm患者的高栓塞率,缓释弹簧圈、纽扣式装置或Amplatzer动脉导管封堵器可能是更好的选择。