Bruhn S, Gollhofer A
Institut für Sport und Sportwissenschaft, Universität Freiburg, Germany.
Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2002 Mar;16(1):15-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-25050.
The purpose of the study was to estimate the stabilising effects of two functional bandages for the knee joint. Two mechanisms typically leading to knee injuries were simulated. Three-dimensional recordings of knee joint angles and recordings of the tibial displacement in anterior-posterior direction were used to determine the destabilisation of the knee joint as a result of the applied mechanical stimuli, as well as the stabilising support of wearing the bandages. Reflex activations of the knee joint muscles and their modulation by the bandages were measured by EMG. To estimate limitations of the sports performance by the bandages, the subjects performed an additional test for postural stability. The testing performance, the three-dimensional knee joint angles and muscle activities were measured. While the FUTURO(R)-knee joint bandage (BDF AG) caused both mechanical and neurophysiological effects, the action of the KASSELER bandage (Sporlastic(R) GmbH) relied solely on the enhancement of muscular activities. The applied methods proved to be a very useful tool for the evaluation of stabilising effects of bandages in functional situations.
本研究的目的是评估两种膝关节功能性绷带的稳定效果。模拟了两种通常导致膝关节损伤的机制。使用膝关节角度的三维记录以及胫骨前后方向位移的记录来确定由于施加的机械刺激导致的膝关节不稳定,以及佩戴绷带的稳定支撑作用。通过肌电图测量膝关节肌肉的反射激活及其受绷带的调节作用。为了评估绷带对运动表现的限制,受试者进行了一项额外的姿势稳定性测试。测量了测试表现、三维膝关节角度和肌肉活动。虽然FUTURO(R)膝关节绷带(BDF AG)产生了机械和神经生理效应,但卡塞勒绷带(Sporlastic(R)GmbH)的作用仅依赖于肌肉活动的增强。所应用的方法被证明是评估绷带在功能情况下稳定效果的非常有用的工具。