Werner J A, Dünne A A, Ramaswamy A, Folz B J, Brandt D, Külkens C, Moll R, Lippert B M
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2002 Feb;259(2):91-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-001-0421-2.
The value of sentinel node (SN) biopsy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) has not been determined yet. A critical evaluation of this concept seems to be mandatory with regard to the increasing acceptance of SN biopsy in other tumor entities. Against the background of the results of 48 previously untreated patients, a reproducible technique for SN biopsy in the head and neck level, which has been adjusted to the special topographic conditions of this anatomic region, is presented. Methods included intraoperative SN biopsy, which was performed in 48 previously untreated patients suffering from squamous cell carcinoma (2x lower lip, 8x oral cavity, 20x oropharynx, 15x larynx, 3x hypopharynx). Using ultrasound imaging, 43 patients were staged as N0 necks, and 5 patients were staged as N1 necks. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was performed in cases of doubt. Surgery on the neck was carried out according to the suspected stage of lymphogenic spread once the SN1 as well as one or two further hot nodes (SN2, SN3) had been identified. Numbers and distribution of the intraoperatively excised nodes SN1-3 were documented according to their relation to the tumor location. Post-operatively, the histologic results of the intraoperatively excised nodes SN1-3 were compared to the histologies of the neck dissection specimen. Results showed that in all 48 patients, a SN1 could be identified intraoperatively. In 20 cases an additional SN2 and in 6 cases a SN3 was diagnosed. In carcinomas of the lower lip and oral cavity, the SN1 was found in 4 cases in level I (2x lower lip, 2x floor of the mouth) and in 6 cases in level II (6x lateral tongue). In carcinomas of the oropharynx, the respective nodes were found in 17 of 20 cases in level II (carcinomas of the tonsil) and in 3 cases in level III (carcinomas of the base of the tongue). In supraglottic carcinomas the SN1 was identified in 8 of 10 cases in level II and in 2/5 patients with glottic carcinomas, while in 3/5 glottic carcinomas as well as in all hypopharyngeal carcinomas, the SN1 was found in level III. In relation to the predictiveness of the detected SN, it has to be remarked that in 38 patients a SN1 free of tumor was representative for the regional lymph node status (pN0). An isolated metastasis (pN1) was diagnosed in the SN (9x SN1, 1x SN2) in 10 patients. In conclusion, the results of a SN biopsy modified to a strictly intraoperative method of detection are encouraging. Critical indications showed that a thorough and standardized technical performance of the injection as well as a mandatory, so far unchanged, neck dissection form the basis for the development of a SN concept for SCCs of the upper aerodigestive tract. The value of the SN concept, however, currently remains unclear for patients suffering from HNSCC.
前哨淋巴结(SN)活检对头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)的价值尚未确定。鉴于前哨淋巴结活检在其他肿瘤实体中的接受度不断提高,对这一概念进行批判性评估似乎是必要的。基于48例未经治疗患者的结果,本文提出了一种适用于头颈部区域的、可重复的前哨淋巴结活检技术,该技术已根据该解剖区域的特殊地形条件进行了调整。方法包括术中前哨淋巴结活检,对48例未经治疗的鳞状细胞癌患者(2例下唇癌、8例口腔癌、20例口咽癌、15例喉癌、3例下咽癌)进行了该操作。通过超声成像,43例患者被分期为N0颈部,5例患者被分期为N1颈部。在有疑问的情况下进行细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)。一旦确定了SN1以及一个或两个其他热结节(SN2、SN3),便根据疑似的淋巴转移阶段对颈部进行手术。根据术中切除的SN1-3淋巴结与肿瘤位置的关系记录其数量和分布。术后,将术中切除的SN1-3淋巴结的组织学结果与颈部清扫标本的组织学结果进行比较。结果显示,在所有48例患者中,术中均可识别出SN1。在20例患者中诊断出额外的SN2,在6例患者中诊断出SN3。在下唇和口腔癌中,4例在I区发现SN1(2例下唇癌、2例口底癌),6例在II区发现SN1(6例舌侧癌)。在口咽癌中,20例中的17例在II区发现相应淋巴结(扁桃体癌),3例在III区发现(舌根癌)。在声门上癌中,10例中的8例在II区发现SN1,2/5例声门癌患者中发现SN1,而在3/5例声门癌以及所有下咽癌中,SN1在III区发现。关于检测到的前哨淋巴结的预测性,必须指出的是,在38例患者中,无肿瘤的SN1代表区域淋巴结状态(pN0)。在10例患者的前哨淋巴结(9例SN1、1例SN2)中诊断出孤立转移(pN1)。总之,改良为严格术中检测方法的前哨淋巴结活检结果令人鼓舞。关键指征表明,注射操作的彻底性和标准化以及目前不变的强制性颈部清扫是上呼吸道消化道鳞状细胞癌前哨淋巴结概念发展的基础。然而,对于HNSCC患者,前哨淋巴结概念的价值目前仍不清楚。