Hildt Elisabeth
Institüt für Medizinische Psychologie, Universität München, Germany.
Med Health Care Philos. 2002;5(1):65-71. doi: 10.1023/a:1014262809712.
An increase in autonomy and freedom is often considered one of the main arguments in favour of a broad use of genetic testing. Starting from Gerald Dworkin's reflections on autonomy and choice this article examines some of the implications which accompany the increase in choices offered by prenatal genetic diagnosis. Although personal autonomy and individual choice are important aspects in the legitimation of prenatal genetic diagnosis, it seems clear that an increase in choice offered by prenatal genetic diagnosis also leads to various implications that may negatively influence the freedom of the persons involved.
自主性和自由度的增加通常被视为广泛使用基因检测的主要论据之一。本文从杰拉尔德·德沃金对自主性和选择的思考出发,探讨了产前基因诊断所提供的选择增加带来的一些影响。尽管个人自主性和个人选择是产前基因诊断合法化的重要方面,但产前基因诊断所提供的选择增加似乎也会带来各种可能对相关人员的自由产生负面影响的影响。