Perry Gilbert J, Wei Chih-Chang, Hankes Gerald H, Dillon S Ray, Rynders Patricia, Mukherjee Rupak, Spinale Francis G, Dell'Italia Louis J
Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Alabama, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Apr 17;39(8):1374-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01763-1.
We hypothesized that angiotensin II type-1 (AT(1)) receptor blocker (AT(1)RB) would prevent adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and LV dysfunction when started at the outset of mitral regurgitation (MR).
Little is known regarding the efficacy of AT(1)RB treatment of MR.
Mitral regurgitation was induced by chordal disruption in adult mongrel dogs. Six normal dogs (NLs) were compared to six untreated MR dogs (MR) and seven dogs treated with the receptor blocker irbesartan (MR+AT(1)RB) started 24 h after induction of MR (60 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.) and continued for three months.
Treatment with AT(1)RB decreased systemic vascular resistance but did not significantly improve cardiac output, LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) or LVEDD/wall thickness compared to untreated MR dogs. Resting isolated cardiomyocyte length increased in MR versus NLs and was further increased in AT(1)RB dogs. Left ventricular end-systolic dimension increased to a greater extent from baseline in AT(1)RB dogs versus untreated MR dogs (29 +/- 9% vs. 12 +/- 6%, p < 0.05), despite a significantly lower LV peak systolic pressure in AT(1)RB dogs. Plasma-angiotensin (ANG) II was elevated greater than threefold in both MR and MR+AT(1)RB versus NLs. In contrast, intracardiac ANG II was increased greater than twofold in MR dogs versus NLs, but was normalized by AT(1)RB.
The use of AT(1)RB decreased systemic vascular resistance and attenuated local expression of the renin-angiotensin system but did not prevent adverse LV chamber and cardiomyocyte remodeling. These results suggest that blockade of the AT(1) receptor does not improve LV remodeling and function in the early myocardial adaptive phase of MR.
我们假设血管紧张素 II 1 型(AT(1))受体阻滞剂(AT(1)RB)在二尖瓣反流(MR)刚开始时使用,能够防止左心室(LV)不良重构和左心室功能障碍。
关于 AT(1)RB 治疗 MR 的疗效,目前所知甚少。
通过切断成年杂种犬的腱索诱导二尖瓣反流。将 6 只正常犬(NLs)与 6 只未经治疗的 MR 犬(MR)以及 7 只在 MR 诱导后 24 小时开始用受体阻滞剂厄贝沙坦治疗的犬(MR + AT(1)RB)进行比较(口服 60 mg/kg,每日两次),持续三个月。
与未经治疗的 MR 犬相比,AT(1)RB 治疗降低了全身血管阻力,但未显著改善心输出量、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)或 LVEDD/壁厚。与 NLs 相比,MR 犬静息分离心肌细胞长度增加,而 AT(1)RB 犬进一步增加。尽管 AT(1)RB 犬的左心室收缩压峰值显著较低,但与未经治疗的 MR 犬相比,AT(1)RB 犬的左心室收缩末期内径从基线增加的幅度更大(29±9% 对 12±6%,p < 0.05)。与 NLs 相比,MR 和 MR + AT(1)RB 犬的血浆血管紧张素(ANG)II 升高超过三倍。相比之下,与 NLs 相比,MR 犬的心内 ANG II 增加超过两倍,但 AT(1)RB 使其恢复正常。
使用 AT(1)RB 降低了全身血管阻力并减弱了肾素 - 血管紧张素系统的局部表达,但未能防止左心室腔和心肌细胞的不良重构。这些结果表明,在 MR 的早期心肌适应阶段,阻断 AT(1)受体并不能改善左心室重构和功能。