Elliott T, Shadbolt N R
Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Biol Cybern. 2002 Apr;86(4):281-92. doi: 10.1007/s00422-001-0303-0.
Recent experimental data indicate that both neurotrophic factors (NTFs) and intracortical inhibitory circuitry are implicated in the development and plasticity of ocular dominance columns. We extend a neurotrophic model of developmental synaptic plasticity, which previously failed to account correctly for the differences between monocular deprivation and binocular deprivation, and show that the inclusion of lateral cortical inhibition is indeed necessary in understanding the effects of visual deprivation in the model. In particular, we argue that monocular deprivation causes a differential shift in the balance between inhibition and excitation in cortical columns, down-regulating NTFs in deprived-eye columns and up-regulating NTFs in undeprived-eye columns; during binocular deprivation, however, no such shift occurs. We thus postulate that the response to visual deprivation is at the level of the cortical circuit, while the mechanisms of afferent segregation are at the molecular or cellular level. Such a dissociation is supported by recent experimental work challenging the assumption that columnar organisation develops in an activity-dependent, competitive fashion. Our extended model also questions recent attempts to distinguish between heterosynaptic and homosynaptic models of synaptic plasticity.
最近的实验数据表明,神经营养因子(NTFs)和皮质内抑制性神经回路均与眼优势柱的发育和可塑性有关。我们扩展了一个发育性突触可塑性的神经营养模型,该模型先前未能正确解释单眼剥夺和双眼剥夺之间的差异,并表明纳入皮质侧向抑制对于理解模型中视觉剥夺的影响确实是必要的。特别是,我们认为单眼剥夺会导致皮质柱中抑制与兴奋平衡的差异转移,下调被剥夺眼柱中的神经营养因子,并上调未被剥夺眼柱中的神经营养因子;然而,在双眼剥夺期间,不会发生这种转移。因此,我们推测对视觉剥夺的反应发生在皮质回路水平,而传入分离的机制则发生在分子或细胞水平。最近的实验工作对柱状组织以活动依赖的竞争方式发展这一假设提出了挑战,支持了这种分离。我们扩展后的模型也对最近区分突触可塑性的异突触和同突触模型的尝试提出了质疑。