Thumboo J, Feng P H, Chan S P, Boey M L, Thio S T, Fong K Y
Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Lupus. 2002;11(2):88-94. doi: 10.1191/0961203302lu156oa.
Despite the prognostic importance of learned helplessness (LH) in rheumatic diseases, there are no validated measures of LH in Chinese or other Asian languages. We therefore assessed the validity of a Chinese translation of the Rheumatology Attitudes Index (CRAI; a widely used measure of LH) and its Helplessness (CHS) and Internality (CIS) subscales in patients with SLE. Chinese-speaking SLE patients (n = 69) completed identical, self-administered questionnaires containing the CRAI and assessing demographic/socio-economic variables twice within 2 weeks. SLE activity, damage and quality of life were assessed using the BILAG, SLICC/ACR Damage Index and SF-36 respectively. Scale psychometric properties were assessed through Cronbach's alpha, intra-class correlations, quantifying test-retest differences, factor analysis and known-groups construct validity. Internal consistency and reliability were acceptable, with Cronbach's alpha for the CHS, CIS and CRAI being 0.70, 0.69 and 0.74, respectively. Mean differences in test-retest scores spanned 1.6-2.4% of possible scale ranges and intra class correlations ranged from 0.72 to 0.88. Factor analysis identified two major factors corresponding to the CHS and CIS subscales of the CRAI. Eight of 10 a priori hypotheses relating the CRAI and CHS to demographic, disease and quality of life variables were confirmed, supporting the construct validity of these scales. The CRAI and its helplessness subscale are valid and reliable measures of learned helplessness in Chinese-speaking SLE patients.
尽管习得性无助(LH)在风湿性疾病中具有重要的预后意义,但目前尚无经过验证的中文或其他亚洲语言版本的LH测量工具。因此,我们评估了风湿态度指数(CRAI,一种广泛使用的LH测量工具)的中文翻译版本及其无助感(CHS)和内控性(CIS)子量表在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者中的有效性。说中文的SLE患者(n = 69)在2周内两次完成了相同的、自我填写的问卷,问卷包含CRAI并评估人口统计学/社会经济变量。分别使用不列颠狼疮评估组(BILAG)、系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床/美国风湿病学会(SLICC/ACR)损伤指数和SF-36评估SLE活动度、损伤和生活质量。通过克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's alpha)、组内相关系数、量化重测差异、因子分析和已知群组结构效度来评估量表的心理测量学特性。内部一致性和可靠性是可接受的,CHS、CIS和CRAI的克朗巴哈系数分别为0.70、0.69和0.74。重测分数的平均差异在可能的量表范围的1.6%至2.4%之间,组内相关系数在0.72至0.88之间。因子分析确定了两个主要因子,分别对应于CRAI的CHS和CIS子量表。与CRAI和CHS相关的10个先验假设中有8个与人口统计学、疾病和生活质量变量相关,支持了这些量表的结构效度。CRAI及其无助感子量表是说中文的SLE患者中习得性无助的有效且可靠的测量工具。