• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫内膜热消融术后的长期组织病理学和形态学变化。

Long-term histopathologic and morphologic changes after thermal endometrial ablation.

作者信息

Taskin Omur, Onoglu Ahmet, Inal Murat, Turan Ersadik, Sadik Salih, Vardar Enver, Postaci Hakan, Wheeler James M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002 May;9(2):186-90. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60130-2.

DOI:10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60130-2
PMID:11960046
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To outline long-term histologic features of endometrial ablation.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

SETTING

Tertiary-care teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-six patients.

INTERVENTION

Thermal ablation followed by second-look office hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mean follow-up time to second-look hysteroscopy after ablation was 33.4 +/- 2,1 months. Complete atrophy, partial adhesions or obliteration of the cavity, and fibrosis were observed at second-look hysteroscopy. Whereas all random biopsies were normal before ablation, biopsies after ablation revealed diminished endometrial glands with necrosis and scarring. The number of endometrial glands was not correlated with amount of bleeding or menstrual pattern. No premalignant or malignant lesions were found after ablation.

CONCLUSION

Although efficacy of endometrial ablation is related to initial thermal destruction and correlated with postablation hysteroscopic and histologic findings, endometrial regrowth is an expected development, not a failure of ablation.

摘要

研究目的

概述子宫内膜消融的长期组织学特征。

设计

前瞻性纵向研究(加拿大工作组分类II-3)。

地点

三级护理教学医院。

患者

26例患者。

干预措施

热消融,随后在门诊进行二次宫腔镜检查并取子宫内膜活检。

测量指标及主要结果

消融后至二次宫腔镜检查的平均随访时间为33.4±2.1个月。二次宫腔镜检查时观察到完全萎缩、部分粘连或宫腔闭塞以及纤维化。消融前所有随机活检均正常,而消融后的活检显示子宫内膜腺体减少伴坏死和瘢痕形成。子宫内膜腺体数量与出血量或月经模式无关。消融后未发现癌前或恶性病变。

结论

虽然子宫内膜消融的疗效与初始热损伤有关,并与消融后宫腔镜检查及组织学结果相关,但子宫内膜再生是预期的发展情况,而非消融失败。

相似文献

1
Long-term histopathologic and morphologic changes after thermal endometrial ablation.子宫内膜热消融术后的长期组织病理学和形态学变化。
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002 May;9(2):186-90. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60130-2.
2
Comparison of the long-term histopathologic and morphologic changes after endometrial rollerball ablation and resection: a prospective randomized trial.子宫内膜滚球消融术与切除术的长期组织病理学和形态学变化比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.06.027.
3
Hysteroscopic appearance of the endometrial cavity following thermal balloon endometrial ablation.热球囊子宫内膜消融术后子宫内膜腔的宫腔镜检查表现。
Fertil Steril. 2003 May;79(5):1226-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04956-7.
4
Hysteroscopic appearance of endometrial cavity after microwave endometrial ablation.经阴道超声在宫腔粘连分离术后的应用
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.09.012.
5
Post-Ablation Cavity Evaluation: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Clinical Study to Evaluate Hysteroscopic Access to the Uterine Cavity 4 Years after Water Vapor Endometrial Ablation for the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.消融术后宫腔评估:一项前瞻性多中心观察性临床研究,旨在评估水蒸气子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多 4 年后宫腔镜进入宫腔的情况。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1273-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.775. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
6
Long-term follow-up of endometrial ablation.子宫内膜切除术的长期随访
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998 May;5(2):115-8. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(98)80075-3.
7
[Hysteroscopic appearance of the endometrial cavity after endometrial ablation].[子宫内膜去除术后子宫内膜腔的宫腔镜检查表现]
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2014 Apr;36(4):170-5. doi: 10.1590/s0100-720320140050.0001. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
8
Long-term clinical outcomes following resectoscopic endometrial ablation of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.子宫异常出血女性经宫腔镜子宫内膜切除术治疗非典型子宫内膜增生后的长期临床结局
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
9
Role of endometrial suppression on the frequency of intrauterine adhesions after resectoscopic surgery.子宫内膜抑制在宫腔镜手术后宫腔粘连发生率中的作用。
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000 Aug;7(3):351-4. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60478-1.
10
Perioperative complication rates of primary and repeat hysteroscopic endometrial ablations.初次及重复宫腔镜子宫内膜切除术的围手术期并发症发生率
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002 May;9(2):175-7. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60127-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrauterine chilled saline instillation reduces endometrial impairment on MRI after ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of uterine adenomyosis.子宫内注入冷生理盐水可减轻超声引导下经皮微波消融子宫腺肌症后MRI上的子宫内膜损伤。
Insights Imaging. 2024 Jun 5;15(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01707-7.
2
Mechanisms of Regeneration and Fibrosis in the Endometrium.子宫内膜再生与纤维化的机制
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2023 Oct 16;39:197-221. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-011723-021442.
3
Human Acellular Amniotic Matrix with Previously Seeded Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Restores Endometrial Function in a Rat Model of Injury.
人去细胞羊膜基质联合预先种植的脐带间充质干细胞在大鼠损伤模型中恢复子宫内膜功能。
Mediators Inflamm. 2021 Sep 3;2021:5573594. doi: 10.1155/2021/5573594. eCollection 2021.
4
Late-onset endometrial ablation failure.迟发性子宫内膜消融失败。
Case Rep Womens Health. 2017 Jul 12;15:11-28. doi: 10.1016/j.crwh.2017.07.001. eCollection 2017 Jul.
5
Progestins in the fertility-sparing treatment and retreatment of patients with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer.孕激素在原发性和复发性子宫内膜癌患者保留生育功能治疗及再次治疗中的应用
Oncologist. 2015 Mar;20(3):270-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0445. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
6
Decreased expression of survivin, estrogen and progesterone receptors in endometrial tissues after radiofrequency treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.射频治疗功能失调性子宫出血后子宫内膜组织中生存素、雌激素和孕激素受体表达降低。
World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;10:100. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-100.