Seymour J, Clark D, Marples R
Sheffield Palliative Care Studies Group, University of Sheffield, Trent Palliative Care Centre, Sheffield, UK.
Palliat Med. 2002 Jan;16(1):5-11. doi: 10.1191/0269216302pm521oa.
Since 1987 health authorities in England have been required to make plans for palliative care provision, but their record in doing so has been patchy. The production of health improvement plans (HlmPs), in which each health authority must set out its priorities and actions designed to improve the health and well-being of its local population, provides an opportunity to examine the extent to which palliative care provision in the NHS is regarded as a priority by policy makers in England. This paper reports on a structured documentary review of the HlmPs published by the 99 health authorities in England. The review indicates that at the moment, in spite of the longstanding duty placed on health authorities to develop strategic plans for palliative care and to assess the level of local palliative care needs, not all have made significant progress in this direction. Among those that do have plans for palliative care, the vast majority of these plans are for people with cancer. What emerges most clearly is a sense in which specialist palliative care, especially for non-cancer patients, is perceived as an 'optional extra' by many health authorities rather than an integral and essential part of the overall supportive care strategy which they clearly are at pains to develop.
自1987年以来,英国的卫生当局一直被要求制定姑息治疗服务计划,但他们在此方面的表现参差不齐。健康改善计划(HlmPs)的制定要求每个卫生当局都必须列出其旨在改善当地居民健康和福祉的优先事项及行动,这为审视英国国民保健制度(NHS)中的姑息治疗服务在多大程度上被政策制定者视为优先事项提供了契机。本文报告了对英国99个卫生当局发布的健康改善计划进行的结构化文献综述。该综述表明,目前,尽管长期以来卫生当局有责任制定姑息治疗战略计划并评估当地姑息治疗需求水平,但并非所有当局都在这方面取得了显著进展。在那些确实有姑息治疗计划的当局中,绝大多数这些计划是针对癌症患者的。最明显的情况是,许多卫生当局将专科姑息治疗,尤其是针对非癌症患者的姑息治疗,视为“额外选项”,而不是他们极力制定的整体支持性护理战略中不可或缺的重要组成部分。