• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新配方CLOtest的评估。

Evaluation of a new formulation CLOtest.

作者信息

Viiala Charlie H, Windsor Helen M, Forbes Geoff M, Chairman Simon O, Marshall Barry J, Mollison Lindsay C

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Feb;17(2):127-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02563.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02563.x
PMID:11966940
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The CLOtest and other rapid urease detection kits are widely used in the endoscopic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. A new formulation CLOtest has been developed with the goal of obtaining a positive result more rapidly. The aims of this study were to validate the sensitivity and specificity of the new test and compare the time taken for a positive result to be visible in both the new and standard CLOtest.

METHODS

Patients presenting for endoscopy at three Western Australian hospitals were prospectively enrolled. Gastric mucosal biopsies were obtained for the standard and new CLOtest and for histology. Grading of color change was conducted by staff blinded to the type of CLOtest used and conducted according to a standardized color chart. Helicobacter pylori status was defined by the combination of a positive standard CLOtest and histology, against which the new CLOtest was compared. Results were obtained at 1, 3 and 24 h, and at one center, at 10 min intervals for the first hour.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-five patients were enrolled. Eighty-eight Helicobacter pylori-positive individuals were identified. At 24 h, the new test correctly identified all 88, with one false-positive result (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.6%). At 1 h, sensitivity was 93% with a number of early false-positive results reducing specificity to 96%. Compared to the current CLOtest, the new formulation became positive faster at 20 min (P = 0.001, n = 51), but was similar at 1 h (P = 0.06, n = 88) and equivalent at 3 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The new formulation CLOtest is sensitive and specific, with a trend to give early positive results more quickly, although accuracy at 3 and 24 h is the same.

摘要

背景与目的

CLO检测试剂盒及其他快速尿素酶检测试剂盒广泛应用于幽门螺杆菌的内镜诊断。已研发出一种新型CLO检测试剂盒,目标是更快获得阳性结果。本研究旨在验证新型检测的敏感性和特异性,并比较新型与标准CLO检测出现阳性结果所需时间。

方法

前瞻性纳入西澳大利亚州三家医院接受内镜检查的患者。获取胃黏膜活检组织用于标准及新型CLO检测和组织学检查。由不了解所使用CLO检测试剂盒类型的工作人员根据标准化色卡对颜色变化进行分级。幽门螺杆菌感染状态通过标准CLO检测阳性和组织学检查结果相结合来定义,并与新型CLO检测结果进行比较。分别在1小时、3小时和24小时获取结果,在一个中心,第1小时内每隔10分钟获取一次结果。

结果

共纳入335例患者。鉴定出88例幽门螺杆菌阳性个体。24小时时,新型检测正确识别出所有88例阳性,有1例假阳性结果(敏感性100%,特异性99.6%)。1小时时,敏感性为93%,一些早期假阳性结果使特异性降至96%。与现行CLO检测相比,新型试剂盒在20分钟时更快出现阳性(P = 0.001,n = 51),但1小时时相似(P = 0.06,n = 88),3小时时相当。

结论

新型CLO检测试剂盒敏感且特异,虽3小时和24小时时准确性相同,但有更快出现早期阳性结果的趋势。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a new formulation CLOtest.一种新配方CLOtest的评估。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Feb;17(2):127-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02563.x.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of reused Pronto Drytest and CLOtest in the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection.重复使用的Pronto Drytest和CLOtest检测幽门螺杆菌感染的诊断准确性。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 12;15:101. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0332-0.
3
Comparison of agar gel (CLOtest) or reagent strip (PyloriTek) rapid urease tests for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection.用于检测幽门螺杆菌感染的琼脂凝胶(CLOtest)或试剂条(PyloriTek)快速尿素酶试验的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jun;92(6):997-9.
4
Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori in gastric brush and biopsy specimens stained by Romanowsky and immunocytochemical methods: comparison with the CLOtest.采用罗曼诺夫斯基染色法和免疫细胞化学方法对胃刷检和活检标本中幽门螺杆菌的诊断:与CLOtest法的比较
Cytopathology. 1996 Apr;7(2):108-19. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1996.38982389.x.
5
Prospective comparison of commercially available rapid urease tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori.用于诊断幽门螺杆菌的市售快速尿素酶试验的前瞻性比较
Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Nov;44(5):523-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70002-0.
6
Evaluation of a locally-made urease test for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection.一种用于检测幽门螺杆菌感染的国产尿素酶试验的评估。
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2002 Mar;9(1):43-7.
7
Accuracy of CLOtest after Helicobacter pylori therapy.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Mar;47(3):250-3. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70321-9.
8
Clotest (rapid urease test) in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.Clotest(快速尿素酶试验)在幽门螺杆菌感染诊断中的应用。
Singapore Med J. 1992 Dec;33(6):568-9.
9
The effects of blood on rapid urease testing for Helicobacter pylori in mucosal biopsies from the gastric antrum.血液对胃窦黏膜活检组织中幽门螺杆菌快速尿素酶检测结果的影响。
Ir J Med Sci. 2000 Jan-Mar;169(1):60-2. doi: 10.1007/BF03170489.
10
Comparison of two rapid urease tests for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection.
Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Aug;43(8):1636-40. doi: 10.1023/a:1018838410272.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison amongst three rapid urease tests to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection in 375 consecutive dyspeptic.三种快速尿素酶试验诊断 375 例消化不良患者幽门螺杆菌感染的比较。
Intern Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;5(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/s11739-009-0344-2.
2
Is Helicobacter pylori being treated appropriately? A study of inpatients and outpatients in a tertiary care centre.幽门螺杆菌是否得到了恰当治疗?一项针对三级医疗中心住院患者和门诊患者的研究。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2007 May;21(5):285-8. doi: 10.1155/2007/628408.
3
Effect of biopsies on sensitivity and specificity of ultra-rapid urease test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective evaluation.
活检对超快速尿素酶试验检测幽门螺杆菌感染的敏感性和特异性的影响:一项前瞻性评估。
World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jul 1;10(13):1907-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i13.1907.