Molenaar Delmar S M, Vermeulen Marinus, de Haan Rob J
Department of Neurology (H2-220), Academic Medical Centre, P. O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Neurol. 2002 Apr;249(4):400-3. doi: 10.1007/s004150200029.
This study compared sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) of four previously published sets of electrodiagnostic criteria for demyelination in 64 patients whose history and physical examination indicated that chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy was a possible diagnosis. Sensitivity of the sets of criteria ranged from 56-70 % and specificity from 85-98 %. Positive LRs ranged from 4.67-28 and negative LR's from 0.35-0.45. The results showed that one set of electrodiagnostic criteria was considerably more helpful than the other three in establishing the diagnosis CIDP. If, however, the test results of the sets were not consistent with demyelination, the effect of the negative test results on the probability of the diagnosis CIDP was similar for all four sets.
本研究比较了四套先前发表的用于脱髓鞘的电诊断标准的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比(LR),研究对象为64例患者,其病史和体格检查表明慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病可能是诊断结果。各套标准的敏感性范围为56%-70%,特异性范围为85%-98%。阳性似然比范围为4.67-28,阴性似然比范围为0.35-0.45。结果表明,在确立慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(CIDP)的诊断方面,一套电诊断标准比其他三套标准更有帮助。然而,如果各套标准的检测结果与脱髓鞘不一致,对于所有四套标准而言,阴性检测结果对CIDP诊断概率的影响是相似的。