Suppr超能文献

印度食鱼鳄的形态学、化石、分歧时间及系统发育关系

Morphology, fossils, divergence timing, and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis.

作者信息

Brochu C A

机构信息

Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

出版信息

Syst Biol. 1997 Sep;46(3):479-522. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/46.3.479.

Abstract

Although morphological data have historically favored a basal position for the Indian gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) within Crocodylia and a Mesozoic divergence between Gavialis and all other crocodylians, several recent molecular data sets have argued for a sister-group relationship between Gavialis and the Indonesian false gharial (Tomistoma schlegelii) and a divergence between them no earlier than the Late Tertiary. Fossils were added to a matrix of 164 discrete morphological characters and subjected to parsimony analysis. When morphology was analyzed alone, Gavialis was the sister taxon of all other extant crocodylians whether or not fossil ingroup taxa were included, and a sister-group relationship between Gavialis and Tomistoma was significantly less parsimonious. In combination with published sequence and restriction site fragment data, Gavialis was the sister taxon of all other living crocodylians, but the position of Tomistoma depended on the inclusion of fossil ingroup taxa; with or without fossils, preferred morphological and molecular topologies were not significantly different. Fossils closer to Gavialis than to Tomistoma can be recognized in the Late Cretaceous, and fossil relatives of Tomistoma are known from the basal Eocene, strongly indicating a divergence long before the Late Tertiary. Comparison of minimum divergence time from the fossil record with different measures of molecular distance indicates evolutionary rate heterogeneity within Crocodylia. Fossils strongly contradict a post-Oligocene divergence between Gavialis and any other living crocodylian, but the phylogenetic placement of Gavialis is best viewed as unresolved.

摘要

尽管从历史上看,形态学数据支持印度食鱼鳄(Gavialis gangeticus)在鳄目(Crocodylia)中处于基部位置,且食鱼鳄与所有其他鳄类动物在中生代就已分化,但最近的几个分子数据集认为食鱼鳄与印度假食鱼鳄(Tomistoma schlegelii)是姐妹群关系,且它们之间的分化不早于晚第三纪。将化石添加到一个包含164个离散形态特征的矩阵中,并进行简约分析。单独分析形态学时,无论是否纳入化石类群,食鱼鳄都是所有其他现存鳄类动物的姐妹分类单元,而食鱼鳄与印度假食鱼鳄之间的姐妹群关系在简约性上明显较差。结合已发表的序列和限制性位点片段数据,食鱼鳄是所有其他现存鳄类动物的姐妹分类单元,但印度假食鱼鳄的位置取决于是否纳入化石类群;无论有无化石,首选的形态学和分子拓扑结构并无显著差异。在晚白垩世可以识别出比印度假食鱼鳄更接近食鱼鳄的化石,而印度假食鱼鳄的化石亲属则已知于始新世早期,这强烈表明它们在晚第三纪之前很久就已分化。将化石记录中的最小分化时间与不同的分子距离测量方法进行比较,表明鳄目内部存在进化速率异质性。化石有力地反驳了食鱼鳄与任何其他现存鳄类动物在渐新世之后分化的观点,但食鱼鳄的系统发育位置最好视为尚未解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验