Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud.
作者信息
Dayton Leigh
出版信息
Science. 2002 Apr 26;296(5568):641. doi: 10.1126/science.296.5568.641b.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud.
Science. 2002 Apr 26;296(5568):641. doi: 10.1126/science.296.5568.641b.
2
Australia. Hall found guilty of lesser misconduct.
Science. 2004 Jan 16;303(5656):298. doi: 10.1126/science.303.5656.298b.
3
Commentary: monitoring biological data.
Account Res. 1990 Oct;1(2):85-6. doi: 10.1080/08989629008573778.
4
Scientific misconduct. Australia probes kidney researcher.
Science. 2002 Apr 19;296(5567):449. doi: 10.1126/science.296.5567.449a.
5
Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
Science. 2002 Oct 4;298(5591):30-1. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5591.30.
6
Not being clear about authorship is lying and damages the scientific record.
Natl Med J India. 2007 Mar-Apr;20(2):56-8.
7
[Reporting of scientific misconduct in health care research].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Aug 31;146(35):1622-4.
8
Next steps in the Schön affair.
Science. 2002 Oct 18;298(5593):495. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5593.495.
9
Writing and publishing health sciences research: ethical considerations and experiences from EAMJ.
East Afr Med J. 1999 Dec;76(12):659-60.
10
Germany. Fraud investigations come up dry.
Science. 2003 Jul 11;301(5630):150. doi: 10.1126/science.301.5630.150b.
Zotero 插件