Klasen E C, Overbeke A J P M
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Den Haag.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Aug 31;146(35):1622-4.
The incidence of scientific dishonesty in the Netherlands is not known, yet experiences at both the NWO (the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research) and Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine) indicate that there must be several cases per year. For scientific fraud to be prevented students and researchers should receive thorough teaching, and in research laboratories an emphasis should be placed upon integrity. The Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam has published a research protocol which is perfect for internal use. The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences publishes brochures on good research practice for researchers, teachers and students. The NWO and the Vereniging van Universiteiten (Dutch Association of Universities) have set up a committee for scientific integrity to function as a fallback mechanism and to assess the institutional procedures or to repeat the inquiries. As healthcare research institutions other than universities are involved since authorities are not always objective, an independent committee has been established to assess complaints about scientific dishonesty, the Scientific Integrity Health Research. Like the Committee on Publication Ethics it will publish its cases anonymously on an annual basis. Its judgments will be communicated to the people involved and the proper authorities.
荷兰科学不端行为的发生率尚不清楚，但荷兰科学研究组织（NWO）和《荷兰医学杂志》的经验表明，每年肯定有几起此类事件。为防止科研欺诈，学生和研究人员应接受全面的教育，并且在研究实验室中应强调诚信。阿姆斯特丹学术医疗中心已发布了一份非常适合内部使用的研究方案。荷兰皇家艺术与科学学院为研究人员、教师和学生出版了关于良好研究实践的手册。NWO和荷兰大学协会设立了一个科学诚信委员会，作为后备机制并评估机构程序或重复进行调查。由于当局并不总是客观的，且除大学外的医疗保健研究机构也参与其中，因此成立了一个独立委员会来评估有关科学不端行为的投诉，即科学诚信健康研究委员会。与出版伦理委员会一样，它将每年匿名公布其处理的案例。其裁决将传达给相关人员和主管部门。
