Eddleston M, Szinicz L, Eyer P, Buckley N
Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, UK.
QJM. 2002 May;95(5):275-83. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/95.5.275.
Acute organophosphorus (OP) pesticide poisoning is widespread in the developing world. Standard treatment involves the administration of intravenous atropine and an oxime to counter acetylcholinesterase inhibition at the synapse, but the usefulness of oximes is uncertain.
To assess the evidence on the use of oximes in OP poisoning.
Systematic review.
We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases (last check 01/02/02) for 'organophosphate' or 'oxime' together with 'poisoning' or 'overdose'. We cross-referenced from other articles, and contacted experts to identify unpublished studies. A Web search engine [www.google.com] was also used, with the keywords 'organophosphate', 'oxime', and 'trial' (last check 01/02/02).
We found two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 182 patients treated with pralidoxime. The RCTs found no benefit with pralidoxime, and have been used to argue that pralidoxime should not be used in OP poisoning.
The RCT authors must be congratulated for attempting important studies in a difficult environment. However, their studies did not take into account recently clarified issues regarding outcome, and their methodology is unclear. A generalized statement that pralidoxime should not be used in OP poisoning is not supported by the published results. Oximes may well be irrelevant in the overwhelming self-poisoning typical of the tropics, but a large RCT comparing the current WHO-recommended pralidoxime regimen (>30 mg/kg bolus followed by >8 mg/kg/h infusion) with placebo is needed for a definitive answer. Such a study should be designed to identify any patient subgroups that might benefit from oximes.
急性有机磷农药中毒在发展中国家广泛存在。标准治疗方法包括静脉注射阿托品和肟类药物,以对抗突触处乙酰胆碱酯酶的抑制作用,但肟类药物的有效性尚不确定。
评估肟类药物用于有机磷中毒治疗的证据。
系统评价。
我们检索了Medline、Embase和Cochrane数据库(最后检索日期为2002年2月1日),查找“有机磷”或“肟”以及“中毒”或“过量用药”的相关内容。我们还从其他文章中进行交叉引用,并联系专家以识别未发表的研究。同时使用了一个网络搜索引擎[www.google.com],搜索关键词为“有机磷”、“肟”和“试验”(最后检索日期为2002年2月1日)。
我们发现两项随机对照试验(RCT),涉及182例接受氯解磷定治疗的患者。这些RCT未发现氯解磷定有任何益处,并据此认为氯解磷定不应用于有机磷中毒的治疗。
必须祝贺RCT的作者们在困难的环境中尝试进行重要研究。然而,他们的研究没有考虑到最近关于结局的明确问题,其方法也不明确。已发表的结果并不支持关于氯解磷定不应用于有机磷中毒治疗的一般性说法。在热带地区典型的大量自我中毒病例中,肟类药物可能确实无关紧要,但需要进行一项大型RCT,将目前世界卫生组织推荐的氯解磷定治疗方案(静脉推注>30mg/kg,随后以>8mg/kg/h持续静脉滴注)与安慰剂进行比较,以得出明确答案。这样的研究应设计用于识别可能从肟类药物中获益的任何患者亚组。