• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过美国邮政进行的基于社区的衣原体和淋病筛查,旧金山

Community-based chlamydia and gonorrhea screening through the United States mail, San Francisco.

作者信息

Bloomfield Peter J, Kent Charlotte, Campbell Diane, Hanbrook Larry, Klausner Jeffrey D

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2002 May;29(5):294-7. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200205000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00007435-200205000-00008
PMID:11984447
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because gonococcal and chlamydial infections are often asymptomatic, disease control requires population-based screening. This report describes the feasibility of home-based testing for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and of specimen transport via the US mail.

GOAL

This project sought to establish the efficacy and acceptability to the public of screening by means of urine kits made available in public places and mailed in for STD testing.

STUDY DESIGN

Self-selected community participants obtained STD test kits from local businesses, collected urine specimens at home, and mailed kits to the health department for nucleic acid amplification testing.

RESULTS

Participants picked up 209 test kits and returned 80 (38%): 3 (3.8%) of 76 were positive for gonorrhea and 1 (1.3%) of 76 was positive for chlamydia. The majority (95%) of participants were white gay men. The cost of specimen collection and transport was similar to that of other population-based screening programs.

CONCLUSION

Using the mail for home-based testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia was feasible and may be a useful addition to STD control efforts.

摘要

背景

由于淋球菌和衣原体感染通常无症状,疾病控制需要基于人群的筛查。本报告描述了在家进行性传播疾病(STD)检测以及通过美国邮政运输样本的可行性。

目标

本项目旨在确定在公共场所提供并邮寄用于STD检测的尿液试剂盒进行筛查对公众的有效性和可接受性。

研究设计

自我选择的社区参与者从当地企业获取STD检测试剂盒,在家中收集尿液样本,并将试剂盒邮寄至卫生部门进行核酸扩增检测。

结果

参与者领取了209个检测试剂盒,归还了80个(38%):76份样本中有3份(3.8%)淋病检测呈阳性,76份样本中有1份(1.3%)衣原体检测呈阳性。大多数(95%)参与者为白人男同性恋者。样本采集和运输成本与其他基于人群的筛查项目相似。

结论

通过邮寄进行淋病和衣原体的家庭检测是可行的,可能是STD控制工作的有益补充。

相似文献

1
Community-based chlamydia and gonorrhea screening through the United States mail, San Francisco.通过美国邮政进行的基于社区的衣原体和淋病筛查,旧金山
Sex Transm Dis. 2002 May;29(5):294-7. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200205000-00008.
2
Chlamydia and gonorrhea screening in San Francisco high schools.旧金山高中的衣原体和淋病筛查
Sex Transm Dis. 2002 Jul;29(7):373-5. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200207000-00001.
3
Repeat chlamydia screening by mail, San Francisco.通过邮件进行衣原体重复筛查,旧金山。
Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Feb;79(1):28-30. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.1.28.
4
Evaluation of chlamydia and gonorrhea screening criteria: San Francisco sexually transmitted disease clinic: 1997 to 1998.衣原体和淋病筛查标准评估:旧金山性传播疾病诊所:1997年至1998年。
Sex Transm Dis. 2000 Mar;27(3):165-7. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200003000-00009.
5
A randomized trial of home versus clinic-based sexually transmitted disease screening among men.一项针对男性的基于家庭与诊所的性传播疾病筛查的随机试验。
Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Nov;39(11):842-7. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182649165.
6
Prevalence of rectal, urethral, and pharyngeal chlamydia and gonorrhea detected in 2 clinical settings among men who have sex with men: San Francisco, California, 2003.2003年在加利福尼亚州旧金山的2个临床环境中检测到的男男性行为者直肠、尿道和咽部衣原体及淋病的患病率。
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jul 1;41(1):67-74. doi: 10.1086/430704. Epub 2005 May 26.
7
Urine screening for gonococcal and chlamydial infections at community-based organizations in a high-morbidity area.在高发病率地区的社区组织中对淋球菌和衣原体感染进行尿液筛查。
Sex Transm Dis. 2000 Mar;27(3):146-51. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200003000-00005.
8
Infections missed by urethral-only screening for chlamydia or gonorrhea detection among men who have sex with men.男性性工作者中仅通过尿道筛查沙眼衣原体或淋病检测而漏诊的感染。
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Oct;38(10):922-4. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31822a2b2e.
9
Urine-based asymptomatic urethral gonorrhea and chlamydia screening and sexual risk-taking behavior in men who have sex with men in greater Boston.大波士顿地区男男性行为者基于尿液的无症状尿道淋病和衣原体筛查及性冒险行为
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007 Mar;21(3):205-11. doi: 10.1089/apc.2006.0051.
10
Screening women in jails for chlamydial and gonococcal infection using urine tests: feasibility, acceptability, prevalence, and treatment rates.使用尿液检测对监狱中的女性进行衣原体和淋病感染筛查:可行性、可接受性、患病率及治疗率。
Sex Transm Dis. 2002 May;29(5):271-6. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200205000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-sampled multi-anatomic site testing for uncovering the community burden of undiagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in men who have sex with men.自我采样多解剖部位检测揭示男男性行为者中未诊断的沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌感染的社区负担。
Infection. 2024 Apr;52(2):491-502. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02107-7. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
2
Pharmacist-led screening in sexually transmitted infections: current perspectives.药剂师主导的性传播感染筛查:当前观点
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2018 Jun 15;7:67-82. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S140426. eCollection 2018.
3
Stability Studies on Dry Swabs and Wet Mailed Swabs for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Aptima Assays.
用于Aptima检测法中沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌检测的干拭子和邮寄湿拭子的稳定性研究
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Mar;55(3):971-977. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02235-16. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
4
Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening Outside the Clinic--Implications for the Modern Sexually Transmitted Disease Program.诊所外的细菌性性传播疾病筛查——对现代性传播疾病项目的影响
Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Feb;43(2 Suppl 1):S42-52. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000343.
5
Obtaining self-samples to diagnose curable sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review of patients' experiences.获取自我样本以诊断可治愈的性传播感染:对患者经历的系统评价
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 24;10(4):e0124310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124310. eCollection 2015.
6
To develop and measure the effectiveness and acceptability of a pharmacy-based chlamydia screening intervention in Australia.开发并衡量澳大利亚基于药房的衣原体筛查干预措施的有效性和可接受性。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 17;3(8):e003338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003338.
7
Home versus clinic-based specimen collection for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.家庭与诊所标本采集检测沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌的比较。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011 Feb;9(2):183-94. doi: 10.1586/eri.10.164.
8
Home compared with clinic-based screening for sexually transmitted infections: a randomized controlled trial.家庭比较与基于诊所的性传播感染筛查:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;116(6):1311-1318. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fae60d.
9
Home-based chlamydia testing of young people attending a music festival--who will pee and post?音乐节期间针对年轻人的家庭衣原体检测——谁会去尿检并寄回样本?
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun 28;10:376. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-376.
10
Home screening compared with clinic-based screening for sexually transmitted infections.家庭筛查与基于诊所的性传播感染筛查比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;115(4):745-752. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d4450d.