Łuczywek E, Pffefer A, Nowicka A, Czyzewski K, ŁaŁowski M, Styczyńska M, Barcikowska M
Kliniki Neurologii CSK MSWiA Zespół Badawczo-Leczniczy Chorób Zwyrodnieniowych Ośrodkowego Układu Nerwowego I CMD i K PAN.
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2001 Nov-Dec;35(6):1021-33.
The aim of this study was to test the possible relationship between patterns of cognitive deficits--especially impairment of memory processes--and ApoE genotype in patients with AD. Fifty seven right-handed subjects (31 males and 26 females) were tested in this study. The age of subjects ranged from 50 to 79, the education lasted from 11 to 16 years. All subjects were diagnosed as probable AD patients on the basis of DSM IV and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Each subject was examined for: 1) ApoE genotype, 2) general level of activity (GDS and MMSE), 3) neuropsychological evaluation of cognitive processes, using full test battery. 37 patients had at least one of ApoE epsilon 4 allele (e2/4, 3 and 4/4) and 20 patients had none of ApoE 4 allele (e 2/3 and 3/3). The group of tested subjects were subdivided into 2 groups. The first group was comprised by 31 patients with 3-rd stage (according to GDS) of mental activity. Twenty six patients with 4-th stage were included into the second group. Those subgroups did not significantly differ if age, education, gender or ApoE allele were considered. Experimental data were normalized and then analyzed using a statistical package SPSS/PC+. The analysis of variance showed that the type of test, stage of disease and two-way interaction ApoE x type of test were highly significant (P < 0.0001). Some results were obvious and not surprising (e.g. that results of patients with 4-th stage were much worse than the results of patients with stage 3-rd). It turned out that the best results were obtained by our patients in naming tests, the worst--in learning test with distraction. Patients with ApoE epsilon 4 performed better than patients with none ApoE epsilon 4 in the Rey's test, in the similarity test and in the test which required repeating numbers starting from the last one. The differences between the subgroups of patients with different ApoE alleles were confirmed by different distributions of correlations. All statistical analyses were repeated for more homogenous group of patients (only with stage 3-rd). The pattern of results resembled the previous one (i.e. better performance in the same tests) with one exception: additionally, in delayed recall test patients with none ApoE epsilon 4 performed much better that ApoE epsilon 4. Our results showed that some cognitive processes depended on ApoE genotype. Patients with none ApoE epsilon 4 genotype had less severe deficits in delayed recall of new information. On the other hand, working memory appeared to be less affected in patients with ApoE epsilon 4 genotype. Independent of genotype, both group showed similar impairment of learning ability without deficits in remote memory.
本研究的目的是检测认知缺陷模式——尤其是记忆过程受损——与阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者载脂蛋白E(ApoE)基因型之间可能存在的关系。本研究对57名右利手受试者(31名男性和26名女性)进行了测试。受试者年龄在50至79岁之间,受教育年限为11至16年。所有受试者均根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)和美国国立神经病学、语言障碍和卒中研究所-阿尔茨海默病及相关疾病协会(NINCDS-ADRDA)标准被诊断为很可能的AD患者。对每位受试者进行了以下检查:1)ApoE基因型;2)总体活动水平(简易精神状态检查表[GDS]和简易精神状态检查量表[MMSE]);3)使用全套测试组合对认知过程进行神经心理学评估。37名患者至少有一个ApoE ε4等位基因(ε2/4、ε3/4和ε4/4),20名患者没有ApoE 4等位基因(ε2/3和ε3/3)。受试组被分为两组。第一组由31名处于精神活动第三阶段(根据GDS)的患者组成。第二组包括26名处于第四阶段的患者。如果考虑年龄﹑受教育程度、性别或ApoE等位基因,这些亚组之间没有显著差异。实验数据进行了标准化处理,然后使用统计软件包SPSS/PC+进行分析。方差分析表明,测试类型、疾病阶段以及ApoE×测试类型的双向交互作用具有高度显著性(P<0.0001)。一些结果是显而易见且不出人意料的(例如,第四阶段患者的结果比第三阶段患者的结果差得多)。结果发现,我们的患者在命名测试中取得了最好的成绩,在分心学习测试中成绩最差。携带ApoE ε4的患者在雷氏测试、相似性测试以及从最后一个数字开始重复数字的测试中表现优于不携带ApoE ε4的患者。不同ApoE等位基因患者亚组之间的差异通过不同的相关性分布得到证实。对更同质的患者组(仅处于第三阶段)重复进行了所有统计分析。结果模式与之前的相似(即在相同测试中表现更好),但有一个例外:此外,在延迟回忆测试中,不携带ApoE ε4的患者表现比携带ApoE ε4的患者好得多。我们的结果表明,一些认知过程取决于ApoE基因型。不携带ApoE ε4基因型的患者在新信息延迟回忆方面的缺陷较轻。另一方面,工作记忆似乎在携带ApoE ε4基因型的患者中受影响较小。与基因型无关,两组在学习能力方面均表现出相似的损伤,且远期记忆无缺陷。