• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Port metastases: fact or fiction?].

作者信息

Fornara P

机构信息

Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Strasse 16, 06097 Halle.

出版信息

Urologe A. 2002 Mar;41(2):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s00120-002-0180-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00120-002-0180-8
PMID:11993088
Abstract

In the early 1990s, the first reports appeared indicating a disturbingly high incidence (20%) of port site metastases following laparoscopic procedures for visceral and gynecological malignancies. At the same time, animal experiments were performed to investigate the phenomenon of port site metastases. The results were independently and repeatedly verified by different groups. In view of these distressing facts, a controversial, at times emotional discussion arose that evolved at least in part without strict regard to the available data. In the recent past, reports on increased incidence of port site metastases after laparoscopic interventions have completely vanished from the literature. Figures on incidence reported by various authors range between 0.5% and 1.3% and thus are comparable to the rate for surgical wound metastases (0.8-1.6%) as known from open conventional methods. Prospective studies have even shown that the survival rate in comparison to conventional techniques is 20% better, at least for laparoscopically treated stage I-III colorectal carcinomas. At present the discussion on the phenomenon of port site metastases can be considered closed. Port site metastases are thus no longer a fact, but also not fiction, since this phenomenon does occur in a small percentage of patients after laparoscopy just as after open surgery.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Port metastases: fact or fiction?].
Urologe A. 2002 Mar;41(2):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s00120-002-0180-8.
2
Laparoscopic port-site metastases in patients with gynecological malignancies.妇科恶性肿瘤患者的腹腔镜穿刺孔转移
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004 Nov-Dec;14(6):1070-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1048-891X.2004.14604.x.
3
Port site metastases in urological laparoscopic surgery.泌尿外科腹腔镜手术中的穿刺孔转移
J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1213-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000035910.75480.4b.
4
Port site metastases.
Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Mar;18(2):185-9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f4ab73.
5
The problem of port-site metastases after laparoscopic cancer surgery.腹腔镜癌症手术后的切口种植转移问题。
Ann Med. 1997 Dec;29(6):477-81. doi: 10.3109/07853899709007471.
6
Port-site metastases following laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术后的穿刺孔转移
Br J Surg. 1998 Jun;85(6):735-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00769.x.
7
The incidence of port-site metastases might be reduced.
Surg Endosc. 1997 Sep;11(9):902-6. doi: 10.1007/s004649900483.
8
Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a systematic review of the published and unpublished data.腹腔镜手术分期子宫内膜癌后发生的端口部位转移:已发表和未发表数据的系统回顾。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):531-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.03.023.
9
[Pathogenesis of puncture-site metastases after laparoscopy].[腹腔镜检查后穿刺部位转移的发病机制]
Zentralbl Chir. 1997;122(5):387-94.
10
[The status of port-site recurrence].
Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr. 2001;118:187-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Port site and peritoneal metastases after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的切口部位及腹膜转移
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5(3):131-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
2
Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery for urological malignancy: forgotten or missed.泌尿外科恶性肿瘤腹腔镜手术后的切口转移:被遗忘还是被漏诊。
Adv Urol. 2012;2012:609531. doi: 10.1155/2012/609531. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
3
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术加回肠膀胱术
Curr Urol Rep. 2005 Mar;6(2):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s11934-005-0074-6.
4
[Laparoscopic vs. open nephrectomy. 10 years' results of a nonrandomized comparative study of 549 patients with benign kidney diseases].[腹腔镜与开放性肾切除术。549例良性肾脏疾病患者非随机对照研究的10年结果]
Urologe A. 2003 Feb;42(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s00120-002-0273-4. Epub 2003 Jan 23.