Taylor David McD, Wolfe Rory, Cameron Peter A
Emergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2002 Mar;14(1):43-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00284.x.
Emergency department patient complaints are often justified and may lead to apology, remedial action or compensation. The aim of the present study was to analyse emergency department patient complaints in order to identify procedures or practices that require change and to make recommendations for intervention strategies aimed at decreasing complaint rates.
We undertook a retrospective analysis of patient complaints from 36 Victorian emergency departments during a 61 month period. Data were obtained from the Health Complaint Information Program (Health Services Commissioner).
In all, 2,419 emergency department patients complained about a total of 3,418 separate issues (15.4% of all issues from all hospital departments). Of these, 1,157 complaints (47.80%) were received by telephone and 829 (34.3%) were received by letter; 1,526 (63.1 %) complaints were made by a person other than the patient. Highest complaint rates were received from patients who were female, born in non-English-speaking countries and very young or very old. One thousand one hundred and forty-one issues (33.4%) related to patient treatment, including inadequate treatment (329 issues) and inadequate diagnosis (249 issues); 1079 (31.6%) issues related to communication, including poor staff attitude, discourtesy and rudeness (444 issues); 407 (11.9%) issues related to delay in treatment. Overall, 2516 issues (73.6%) were resolved satisfactorily, usually by explanation or apology. Only 59 issues (1.7%) resulted in a procedure or policy change. Remedial action was taken in 109 issues (3.2%) and compensation was paid to eight patients.
Communication remains a significant factor in emergency department patient dissatisfaction. While patient complaints have resulted in major changes to policy and procedure, research and intervention strategies into communication problems are indicated. In the short term, focused staff training is recommended.
急诊科患者的投诉往往是合理的,可能会导致道歉、补救措施或赔偿。本研究的目的是分析急诊科患者的投诉,以确定需要改进的程序或做法,并为旨在降低投诉率的干预策略提出建议。
我们对36个维多利亚州急诊科在61个月期间的患者投诉进行了回顾性分析。数据来自健康投诉信息项目(卫生服务专员)。
总共有2419名急诊科患者投诉了3418个不同的问题(占所有医院科室所有问题的15.4%)。其中,1157起投诉(47.80%)通过电话收到,829起(34.3%)通过信件收到;1526起投诉(63.1%)由患者以外的人提出。投诉率最高的是女性、出生在非英语国家以及非常年轻或非常年老的患者。1141个问题(33.4%)与患者治疗有关,包括治疗不足(329个问题)和诊断不足(249个问题);1079个问题(31.6%)与沟通有关,包括工作人员态度差、无礼和粗鲁(444个问题);407个问题(11.9%)与治疗延误有关。总体而言,2516个问题(73.6%)得到了满意解决,通常是通过解释或道歉。只有59个问题(1.7%)导致了程序或政策的改变。109个问题(3.2%)采取了补救措施,8名患者获得了赔偿。
沟通仍然是急诊科患者不满的一个重要因素。虽然患者投诉导致了政策和程序的重大改变,但仍需对沟通问题进行研究并制定干预策略。短期内,建议进行有针对性的员工培训。