Ridolfi Laura, Ridolfi Ruggero
Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo and Medical Oncology Department, Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Mar-Apr;49(44):335-9.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Antigen presenting cells are inactive within tumor tissue because of local immunosuppression. Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte signal activation transducing mechanisms are also seriously impaired. Administration of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor may lead to antigen-presenting cell recovery and interleukin-2 may restore local tumor infiltrating lymphocyte activation. Moreover, interleukin-2 increases the systemic lymphocyte population, an event which seems to correlate with a better prognosis. The present phase I-II study was carried out to examine whether intralesional injection of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor followed by subcutaneous interleukin-2 would induce a clinical response in advanced, pretreated and elderly melanoma patients.
Fourteen patients over 60 years of age received intralesional granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (150 micrograms per lesion on day 1), generally divided between the two largest cutaneous lesions, followed by perilesional subcutaneous interleukin-2 (3.000.000/IU) for 5 days (3 to 7) every 3 weeks. All patients received 6 courses of treatment unless progression occurred. Clinical evaluation of the treated cutaneous lesions was assessed at the baseline and before every cycle. Distant lesions were checked every two cycles.
Four clinical responses (2 partial responses and 2 minimal responses) (28.5%), which also involved lesions that had not been directly treated, and seven cases of stable disease were observed. The response duration for partial response and minimal response was 9, 4, 4 and 2.5+ months, respectively. Stable disease (50%) recorded in the 7 patients was short term, 3-6 months. Three patients rapidly progressed after 2, 2, and 1 therapy cycles, respectively. The patient who reached the best partial response had a fairly high absolute lymphocyte count (1600 to 2400/mm3). The second one, who reached a complete remission after subsequent locoregional chemotherapy and hyperthermia, had a low absolute lymphocyte count which had doubled, however, by the end of treatment. Blood lymphocyte values in the other patients were too varied to allow any correlation with clinical response. Therapy was well tolerated and only mild fever was observed, with the exception of one patient who had grade 3 fever, with muscle pain and arthralgia.
Considering the very low toxicity observed, this treatment might be indicated in elderly patients for whom systemic therapy is no longer a viable option. Improved scheduling and timing could result from further studies.
背景/目的:由于局部免疫抑制,抗原呈递细胞在肿瘤组织内处于无活性状态。肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞信号激活转导机制也受到严重损害。给予粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子可能导致抗原呈递细胞恢复,而白细胞介素-2可能恢复局部肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞的激活。此外,白细胞介素-2可增加全身淋巴细胞数量,这一事件似乎与较好的预后相关。本I-II期研究旨在探讨病灶内注射粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子后皮下注射白细胞介素-2是否会在晚期、经过预处理的老年黑色素瘤患者中诱导临床反应。
14名60岁以上的患者接受病灶内粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(第1天每个病灶150微克),通常注射在两个最大的皮肤病灶之间,随后在病灶周围皮下注射白细胞介素-2(3000000国际单位),每3周注射5天(第3至7天)。所有患者接受6个疗程的治疗,除非病情进展。在基线时和每个周期前对治疗的皮肤病灶进行临床评估。每两个周期检查远处病灶。
观察到4例临床反应(2例部分缓解和2例微小缓解)(28.5%),其中还包括未直接治疗的病灶,以及7例病情稳定的病例。部分缓解和微小缓解的反应持续时间分别为9、4、4和2.5+个月。7例患者记录的病情稳定(50%)为短期,3至6个月。3例患者分别在2、2和1个治疗周期后迅速进展。达到最佳部分缓解的患者绝对淋巴细胞计数相当高(1600至2400/mm3)。第二例患者在随后的局部区域化疗和热疗后达到完全缓解,其绝对淋巴细胞计数较低,但在治疗结束时翻倍。其他患者的血液淋巴细胞值差异太大,无法与临床反应建立任何关联。治疗耐受性良好,仅观察到轻度发热,有1例患者出现3级发热,并伴有肌肉疼痛和关节痛。
考虑到观察到的毒性非常低,这种治疗方法可能适用于不再适合全身治疗的老年患者。进一步的研究可能会改善治疗方案和时间安排。