Lo Joan C
Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan.
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Mar;54(6):981-91. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00071-5.
Cancer has been the leading cause of death in Taiwan since 1982, with nearly one out of four deaths caused by malignant neoplasm. The huge amount of money being spent in the acute care setting for terminally ill cancer patients does not increase their wellbeing. In this study, we employ an Instrumental Variable (IV) model to correct for the self-selection problem and use population-based insurance claim data to test two null hypotheses: there is no difference in total expenditures between hospice care and conventional care, and that there is no difference in total expenditures between hospital-based hospice care and home hospice care. Both null hypotheses are rejected.
自1982年以来,癌症一直是台湾地区的主要死因,近四分之一的死亡由恶性肿瘤导致。用于晚期癌症患者急性护理的巨额资金并未提升他们的福祉。在本研究中,我们采用工具变量(IV)模型来校正自我选择问题,并使用基于人群的保险理赔数据来检验两个零假设:临终关怀与传统护理之间的总支出没有差异,以及医院临终关怀与居家临终关怀之间的总支出没有差异。两个零假设均被拒绝。