• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨颈内侧骨折的分类

Classification of medial fractures of the femoral neck.

作者信息

Nieminen S, Satokari K

出版信息

Acta Orthop Scand. 1975 Nov;46(5):775-81. doi: 10.3109/17453677508989264.

DOI:10.3109/17453677508989264
PMID:1199716
Abstract

In this study 444 consecutive cases of medial fracture of the femoral neck treated in the city of Turku are considered on the basis of the proposals of Garden (1961) and Pauwels (Leitz 1966) for the classification of fracture types. In order to find out what kind of classification is most practical and coherent a retrospective comparison of the progress of healing was made on the basis of the aforementioned classifications of fracture. Garden's classification proved to be far more logical and was much more reliable for the prognosis of recovery. For this reason and also because of the ease with which his criteria can be applied, the present authors recommend the general use of Garden's classification.

摘要

在本研究中,根据加登(1961年)和 Pauwels(Leitz,1966年)提出的股骨颈内侧骨折类型分类建议,对图尔库市连续治疗的444例股骨颈内侧骨折病例进行了分析。为了找出哪种分类最实用且连贯,在上述骨折分类的基础上,对愈合过程进行了回顾性比较。结果证明,加登分类法逻辑性更强,对恢复预后的可靠性也更高。基于这个原因,同时也因其标准易于应用,本文作者推荐广泛使用加登分类法。

相似文献

1
Classification of medial fractures of the femoral neck.股骨颈内侧骨折的分类
Acta Orthop Scand. 1975 Nov;46(5):775-81. doi: 10.3109/17453677508989264.
2
Classification of medial fractures of the femoral neck.股骨颈内侧骨折的分类
Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn. 1975;64(6):369-74.
3
[Covered osteosynthesis through cannulated screws in medial Garden type I and II femoral neck fractures].经皮空心螺钉内固定治疗Garden I型和II型股骨颈内侧骨折
Unfallchirurg. 1995 Sep;98(9):478-82.
4
Perception of Garden's classification for femoral neck fractures: an international survey of 298 orthopaedic trauma surgeons.对股骨颈骨折Garden分型的认知:一项针对298名骨科创伤外科医生的国际调查。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Sep;125(7):503-5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0022-4.
5
Garden's classification of femoral neck fractures. An assessment of inter-observer variation.股骨颈骨折的Garden分型。观察者间差异评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Aug;70(4):588-90. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.70B4.3403602.
6
Observer variation in the radiographic classification of fractures of the neck of the femur using Garden's system.使用Garden系统对股骨颈骨折进行影像学分类时的观察者差异。
Int Orthop. 1996;20(5):326-9. doi: 10.1007/s002640050087.
7
Classification and diagnosis of intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur.股骨近端囊内骨折的分类与诊断
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Jun(399):17-27. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200206000-00004.
8
[Subtype classification of Garden III femoral neck fractures in the elderly based on frontal Garden index and its clinical significance].基于正位Garden指数的老年GardenⅢ型股骨颈骨折亚型分类及其临床意义
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Nov 25;29(11):982-988. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.11.003.
9
AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels classification systems of femoral neck fractures: are they reliable and reproducible?股骨颈骨折的AO组、AO亚组、Garden和Pauwels分类系统:它们可靠且可重复吗?
Med Glas (Zenica). 2012 Aug;9(2):243-7.
10
Is surgeons' experience important on intra- and inter-observer reliability of classifications used for adult femoral neck fracture?外科医生的经验对于成人股骨颈骨折分类的观察者内和观察者间可靠性是否重要?
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Dec;50(6):601-605. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, reliability, agreement and validity of the Turkish version of Cumulated Ambulation Score in patients with hip fracture.髋部骨折患者土耳其语版累积步行评分的翻译、信度、一致性和效度
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(2):346-352. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.75526. Epub 2020 Jun 18.