Donahue Sean P, Johnson Tammy M, Ottar Wanda, Scott William E
Department of Ophthalmology, Vanderbilt, University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8808, USA.
J AAPOS. 2002 Apr;6(2):86-91. doi: 10.1067/mpa.2002.121168.
To determine the sensitivity of a unique pupil-size based set of referral criteria of the MTI PhotoScreener(Medical Technology and Innovations, Inc, Cedar Falls, Iowa) to detect high magnitude refractive error.
The photoscreening photographs of 949 preschool children previously analyzed were reevaluated with the new referral criteria. The original photographs had been obtained from pediatricians' offices and public health and Women, Infants, and Children's (WIC) clinics. The results of this analysis were compared with the gold standard clinical examination and cycloplegic refraction. Sensitivities were calculated for amblyogenic factors based on the magnitude of the refractive error.
For 26 patients with anisometropia, the sensitivity to detect anisometropia increased from 46% for +1.25 or greater spherical interocular difference to 100% for +2.50 spherical intraocular difference. For 36 patients with hypermetropia in at least 1 meridian ranging from +3.75 to +7.50 D, sensitivity increased from 53% to detect +3.75 D or greater to 70% for +5.00 D or greater. The sensitivity to detect hypermetropia of +5.75 D or greater was 100%. These criteria detected 82% of patients with astigmatism greater than or equal to +3.00 D, and 100% of patients with astigmatism greater than +3.50 D.
It is crucial that screening programs avoid over-referrals caused by high false-positive screening rates. The sensitivity of our new criteria increases with higher magnitude refractive error; patients with moderate and severe amblyogenic factors are almost never missed. While the sensitivity to detect lower magnitude refractive error is poor, the amblyogenic impact of such errors remains to be determined.
确定基于独特瞳孔大小的MTI PhotoScreener(医学技术与创新公司,爱荷华州锡达福尔斯)转诊标准检测高度屈光不正的敏感性。
使用新的转诊标准对之前分析的949名学龄前儿童的照片筛查照片进行重新评估。原始照片来自儿科医生办公室、公共卫生机构以及妇女、婴儿和儿童(WIC)诊所。将该分析结果与金标准临床检查和睫状肌麻痹验光结果进行比较。根据屈光不正的程度计算对致弱视因素的敏感性。
对于26例屈光参差患者,检测屈光参差的敏感性从球镜眼间差异为+1.25或更大时的46%提高到球镜眼内差异为+2.50时的100%。对于36例至少一个子午线远视度数在+3.75至+7.50 D之间的远视患者,检测+3.75 D或更大远视的敏感性从53%提高到检测+5.00 D或更大远视时的70%。检测+5.75 D或更大远视的敏感性为100%。这些标准检测出82%散光度数大于或等于+3.00 D的患者,以及100%散光度数大于+3.50 D的患者。
筛查项目避免因高假阳性筛查率导致过度转诊至关重要。我们新标准的敏感性随着屈光不正程度的增加而提高;中度和重度致弱视因素的患者几乎不会漏诊。虽然检测低度数屈光不正的敏感性较差,但此类误差对弱视的影响仍有待确定。