• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

70岁及以上女性乳腺钼靶筛查的益处、危害及成本:一项系统综述

Benefits, harms and costs of screening mammography in women 70 years and over: a systematic review.

作者信息

Barratt Alexandra L, Les Irwig M, Glasziou Paul P, Salkeld Glenn P, Houssami Nehmat

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2002 Mar 18;176(6):266-71. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04405.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04405.x
PMID:11999259
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the (i) benefits, (ii) harms and (iii) costs of continuing mammographic screening for women 70 years and over.

DATA SOURCES AND SYNTHESIS

(i) We conducted a MEDLINE search (1966 - July 2000) for decision-analytic models estimating life-expectancy gains from screening in older women. The five studies meeting the inclusion criteria were critically appraised using standard criteria. We estimated relative benefit from each model's estimate of effectiveness of screening in older women relative to that in women aged 50-69 years using the same model. (ii) With data from BreastScreen Queensland, we constructed balance sheets of the consequences of screening for women in 10-year age groups (40-49 to 80-89 years), and (iii) we used a validated model to estimate the marginal cost-effectiveness of extending screening to women 70 years and over.

RESULTS

For women aged 70-79 years, the relative benefit was estimated as 40%-72%, and 18%-62% with adjustment for the impact of screening on quality of life. For women over 80 years the relative benefit was about a third, and with quality-of-life adjustment only 14%, that in women aged 50-69 years. (ii) Of 10,000 Australian women participating in ongoing screening, about 400 are recalled for further testing, and, depending on age, about 70-112 undergo biopsy and about 19-80 cancers are detected. (iii) Cost-effectiveness estimates for extending the upper age limit for mammographic screening from 69 to 79 years range from $8119 to $27 751 per quality-adjusted life-year saved, which compares favourably with extending screening to women aged 40-49 years (estimated at between $24,000 and $65,000 per life-year saved).

CONCLUSIONS

Women 70 years and over, in consultation with their healthcare providers, may want to decide for themselves whether to continue mammographic screening. Decision-support materials are needed for women in this age group.

摘要

目的

评估对70岁及以上女性继续进行乳房X线筛查的(i)益处、(ii)危害和(iii)成本。

数据来源与综合分析

(i)我们在MEDLINE数据库(1966年 - 2000年7月)中进行检索,查找用于估计老年女性筛查预期寿命增益的决策分析模型。使用标准标准对符合纳入标准的五项研究进行严格评估。我们使用同一模型,根据每个模型对老年女性筛查有效性的估计,相对于50 - 69岁女性的筛查有效性,来估计相对益处。(ii)利用昆士兰乳房筛查的数据,我们编制了10岁年龄组(40 - 49岁至80 - 89岁)女性筛查后果的资产负债表,并且(iii)我们使用一个经过验证的模型来估计将筛查扩展至70岁及以上女性的边际成本效益。

结果

对于70 - 79岁的女性,估计相对益处为40% - 72%,在对筛查对生活质量的影响进行调整后为18% - 62%。对于80岁以上的女性,相对益处约为三分之一,仅在对生活质量进行调整后为50 - 69岁女性的14%。(ii)在10000名参与正在进行的筛查的澳大利亚女性中,约400人被召回进一步检查,并且根据年龄不同,约70 - 112人接受活检,约19 - 80人被检测出患有癌症。(iii)将乳房X线筛查年龄上限从69岁扩展至79岁的成本效益估计为每挽救一个质量调整生命年8119美元至27751美元,这与将筛查扩展至40 - 49岁女性(估计为每挽救一个生命年24000美元至65000美元)相比更具优势。

结论

70岁及以上的女性在与其医疗保健提供者协商后,可能希望自行决定是否继续进行乳房X线筛查。这个年龄组的女性需要决策支持材料。

相似文献

1
Benefits, harms and costs of screening mammography in women 70 years and over: a systematic review.70岁及以上女性乳腺钼靶筛查的益处、危害及成本:一项系统综述
Med J Aust. 2002 Mar 18;176(6):266-71. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04405.x.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
7
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
8
Hormonal therapies for early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.早期乳腺癌的激素疗法:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Jul;11(26):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta11260.
9
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
10
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口疗法在一期缝合手术伤口愈合中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7.

引用本文的文献

1
Mammography and Decision Aid Use for Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women.乳腺 X 线摄影术和决策辅助工具在老年女性乳腺癌筛查中的应用。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Oct;63(4):630-635. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.014. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening using mammography; a systematic review.使用乳房X线摄影术进行乳腺癌筛查的成本效益;一项系统评价。
Iran J Public Health. 2013 Apr 1;42(4):347-57. Print 2013.
3
Should breast cancer survivors be excluded from, or invited to, organised mammography screening programmes?
乳腺癌幸存者应被排除在有组织的乳腺癌筛查计划之外,还是应被邀请参加?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 4;11:249. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-249.
4
Cost-effective mammography screening in Korea: high incidence of breast cancer in young women.韩国具有成本效益的乳腺钼靶筛查:年轻女性乳腺癌高发
Cancer Sci. 2009 Jun;100(6):1105-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01147.x. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
5
By invitation only - the case for breast cancer screening reminders for women over 69 years.仅通过邀请——为69岁以上女性提供乳腺癌筛查提醒的理由。
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2008 Nov 6;5:23. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-5-23.
6
Toward optimal screening strategies for older women. Costs, benefits, and harms of breast cancer screening by age, biology, and health status.迈向老年女性的最佳筛查策略。按年龄、生物学特征和健康状况进行乳腺癌筛查的成本、益处及危害。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):487-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0116.x.
7
[When to begin breast cancer care?].[何时开始乳腺癌护理?]
Aten Primaria. 2004 Feb 15;33(2):99-103. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(04)79358-0.