• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性右束支传导阻滞和左后分支阻滞。临床、电生理及预后观察。

Chronic right bundle branch block and left posterior hemiblock. Clinical, electrophysiologic and prognostic observations.

作者信息

Dhingra R C, Denes P, Wu D, Chuquimia R, Amat-Y-Leon F, Wyndham C, Rosen K M

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1975 Dec;36(7):867-79. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90075-2.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(75)90075-2
PMID:1199943
Abstract

Twenty-one patients with long-term right bundle branch block and left posterior himiblock were studied electrophysiologically and then followed up prospectively. The group consisted of 19 men and 2 woman aged 61 +/- 2.7 years (mean +/- standard error of the mean). The majority of patients had either hypertensive cardiovascular disease (48 percent) or primary conduction disease (33 percent). Initial electrophysiologic studies revealed A-H intervals of 58 to 152 msec (mean 98 +/- 7.7) and H-V intervals of 40 to 80 msec (mean 52 +/- 2.1). Six patients (29 percent) had prolonged H-V intervals. The follow-up period ranged from 91 to 1,231 days (mean 671 +/-68). Three of 21 patients (14 percent) needed a permanent pacemaker after development of the following symptomatic conduction disease: sinoatrial block on day 3 of follow-up; second degree atrioventricular (A-V) block, site undetermined, on day 118; and second degree A-V block proximal to the His bundle on day 398. One patient died suddenly (on day 571), and two others died of noncardiac causes. In conclusion, combined right bundle branch block and left posterior hemiblock was associated with less trifascicular disease than reported previously. The clinical course of most of the patients was benign and the incidence of sudden death was relatively small. Symptomatic conduction disease occurred but could be definitely related to trifascicular disease in only one patient. These short-term data suggest that prophylactic pacemaker insertion is not routinely indicated in patients with chronic right bundle branch block and left posterior hemiblock.

摘要

对21例长期存在右束支传导阻滞和左后分支阻滞的患者进行了电生理研究,并进行了前瞻性随访。该组包括19名男性和2名女性,年龄为61±2.7岁(平均±平均标准误差)。大多数患者患有高血压性心血管疾病(48%)或原发性传导疾病(33%)。初始电生理研究显示A-H间期为58至152毫秒(平均98±7.7),H-V间期为40至80毫秒(平均52±2.1)。6例患者(29%)H-V间期延长。随访期为91至1231天(平均671±68)。21例患者中有3例(14%)在出现以下症状性传导疾病后需要植入永久性起搏器:随访第3天出现窦房阻滞;随访第118天出现部位不明的二度房室传导阻滞;随访第398天出现希氏束近端的二度房室传导阻滞。1例患者突然死亡(第571天),另外2例死于非心脏原因。总之,与先前报道相比,合并右束支传导阻滞和左后分支阻滞与三分支疾病较少相关。大多数患者的临床病程是良性的,猝死发生率相对较低。出现了症状性传导疾病,但只有1例患者可明确与三分支疾病有关。这些短期数据表明,对于慢性右束支传导阻滞和左后分支阻滞患者,通常不建议预防性植入起搏器。

相似文献

1
Chronic right bundle branch block and left posterior hemiblock. Clinical, electrophysiologic and prognostic observations.慢性右束支传导阻滞和左后分支阻滞。临床、电生理及预后观察。
Am J Cardiol. 1975 Dec;36(7):867-79. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90075-2.
2
[Progression to 2d and 3d grade atrioventricular block in patients after electrostimulation for bundle-branch block and syncope: a long-term study].[束支传导阻滞和晕厥患者电刺激后进展为二度和三度房室传导阻滞:一项长期研究]
G Ital Cardiol. 1994 Apr;24(4):409-16.
3
H-V interval in patients with bifascicular block (right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock). Clinical, electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic correlations.双分支阻滞(右束支阻滞合并左前分支阻滞)患者的H-V间期。临床、心电图及电生理相关性。
Am J Cardiol. 1975 Jan;35(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90554-8.
4
Electrophysiologic and pathologic correlations in two cases of chronic second degree atrioventricular block with left bundle branch block.
Circulation. 1975 Aug;52(2):221-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.52.2.221.
5
Significance of A-H interval in patients with chronic bundle branch block. Clinical, electrophysiologic and follow-up observations.
Am J Cardiol. 1976 Feb;37(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90317-9.
6
Incidence and site of atrioventricular block in patients with chronic bifascicular block.慢性双分支阻滞患者房室传导阻滞的发生率及部位
Circulation. 1979 Feb;59(2):238-46. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.59.2.238.
7
A prospective study of sudden death in "high-risk" bundle-branch block.“高危”束支传导阻滞猝死的前瞻性研究。
N Engl J Med. 1978 Aug 3;299(5):209-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197808032990501.
8
Second-degree atrioventricular block in the His-Purkinje system following acute myocardial infarction. Clinical observations on its evolution.急性心肌梗死后希氏-浦肯野系统二度房室传导阻滞。其演变的临床观察。
Chest. 1977 May;71(5):615-23. doi: 10.1378/chest.71.5.615.
9
Conduction Abnormalities and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Repositionable LOTUS Device: The United Kingdom Experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用可重定位 LOTUS 装置后的传导异常和永久性起搏器植入:英国经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1247-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.044.
10
Transient unifascicular, bifasicular and trifascicular block: electrophysiologic correlations in a patient with rate-dependent left bundle branch block and transient right bundle branch block.短暂性单束支、双束支和三束支阻滞:一例伴有频率依赖性左束支阻滞和短暂性右束支阻滞患者的电生理相关性
Am J Cardiol. 1977 Jan;39(1):116-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(77)80021-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic bilateral bundle-branch block. Long-term observations in ambulatory patients.慢性双侧束支传导阻滞。对门诊患者的长期观察。
Br Heart J. 1977 Feb;39(2):203-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.39.2.203.