Glover Scott, Dixon Peter
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Feb;64(2):266-78. doi: 10.3758/bf03195791.
A distinction between planning and control can be used to explain the effects of context-induced illusions on actions. The present study tested the effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on the planning and control of the grip aperture in grasping a disk. In two experiments, the illusion had an effect on grip aperture that decreased as the hand approached the target, whether or not visual feedback was available. These results are taken as evidence in favor of a planning/control model, in which planning is susceptible to context-induced illusions, whereas control is not. It is argued that many dissociations between perception and action may better be explained as dissociations between perception and on-line control.
计划与控制之间的区别可用于解释情境诱发的错觉对行动的影响。本研究测试了艾宾浩斯错觉对抓取圆盘时握力孔径的计划与控制的影响。在两个实验中,无论是否有视觉反馈,错觉都会对握力孔径产生影响,且这种影响会随着手靠近目标而减小。这些结果被视为支持计划/控制模型的证据,在该模型中,计划容易受到情境诱发的错觉影响,而控制则不会。有人认为,知觉与行动之间的许多分离现象,或许可以更好地解释为知觉与在线控制之间的分离。