Berg-Cross L G
Child Dev. 1975 Dec;46(4):970-4.
153 first graders were given Piagetian moral judgment problems with a new simplified methodology as well as the usual story-pair paradigm. The new methodology involved making quantitative judgments about single stories and examined the influence of level of intentionality and degree of damage upon absolute punishment ratings. Contrary to results obtained with a story-pair methodology, it was found that with single stories even 6-year-old children responded to the level of intention in the stories as well as the quantity and quality of damage involved. This suggested that Piaget's methodology may be forcing children to employ a simplifying strategy while under other conditions they are able to perform the mental operations necessary to make complex moral judgments.
153名一年级学生接受了皮亚杰式道德判断问题测试,采用了一种新的简化方法以及通常的故事对范式。新方法涉及对单个故事进行定量判断,并研究意图水平和损害程度对绝对惩罚评分的影响。与故事对方法得到的结果相反,研究发现,对于单个故事,即使是6岁的儿童也会对故事中的意图水平以及所涉及的损害数量和质量做出反应。这表明,皮亚杰的方法可能迫使儿童采用一种简化策略,而在其他条件下,他们能够进行做出复杂道德判断所需的心理操作。