Suppr超能文献

一项关于前臂血糖监测与指尖血糖监测的研究。

A study of forearm versus finger stick glucose monitoring.

作者信息

Lee Debra M, Weinert Sandra E, Miller Earl E

机构信息

Research and Development, Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana 46256, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2002;4(1):13-23; discussion 45-7. doi: 10.1089/15209150252924049.

Abstract

New glucose monitoring systems are now being launched into the market that offer the patient the option to test from an alternate site (forearm) with less pain. What is not clearly understood by patients and Health Care Providers is whether glucose measurements taken from the forearm are the same as the measurements taken from the finger. The objective of this study was to determine if results from the forearm are the same as results from the finger in normal use by the diabetic patient over a day. In clinical studies conducted in four physician's offices, patients were asked to measure their glucose from their forearm and finger ten times a day for ten days. The patients for this evaluation used the TheraSense FreeStyle glucose monitoring system. A total of 190 patients (of which 30% were type 1 and 70% type 2 diabetics) participated in this study. Patients also concluded their participation in this study with a post study questionnaire. A total of 18,036 data points were collected and used for analysis. Data was separated into four groups: preprandial, 1-h postprandial, 2-h postprandial, and bedtime. In three of the four groups, the mean bias was less than 1 mg/dL or %, whereas the 1-h postprandial group showed a mean bias of -6.02 mg/dL or %. The differences in bias between the 1-h postprandial to the preprandial and the 1-h postprandial to the 2-h postprandial, were statistically significant with a p value of <0.0001. Comparison of bias at 2-h postprandial to the preprandial bias was not statistically significant with a p value of 0.8073, indicating that the 2-h postprandial had an overall mean bias, the same as the preprandial. The 1-h postprandial results indicate that patients who test during this period of time could expect to see significant differences between their forearm and finger measurements. Patients who test during this time period should only test using their finger since this would best represent their true glucose. Patients who would test during periods identified as preprandial and 2-h postprandial could expect to see small differences between their forearm and finger measurements. These differences are also not dependent on the method by which patients use to control their disease.

摘要

新型血糖监测系统现已投放市场,为患者提供了从替代部位(前臂)进行检测且疼痛较小的选择。患者和医疗服务提供者并不清楚的是,从前臂测得的血糖值是否与从手指测得的相同。本研究的目的是确定在糖尿病患者一天的正常使用中,前臂检测结果是否与手指检测结果相同。在四个医生办公室进行的临床研究中,要求患者每天从前臂和手指测量血糖十次,持续十天。参与此次评估的患者使用了TheraSense FreeStyle血糖监测系统。共有190名患者(其中1型糖尿病患者占30%,2型糖尿病患者占70%)参与了这项研究。患者还通过一份研究后问卷结束了他们在本研究中的参与。总共收集了18036个数据点并用于分析。数据被分为四组:餐前、餐后1小时、餐后2小时和就寝时间。在四组中的三组中,平均偏差小于1毫克/分升或%,而餐后1小时组的平均偏差为-6.02毫克/分升或%。餐后1小时与餐前以及餐后1小时与餐后2小时之间偏差的差异具有统计学意义,p值<0.0001。餐后2小时偏差与餐前偏差的比较无统计学意义,p值为0.8073,表明餐后2小时的总体平均偏差与餐前相同。餐后1小时的结果表明,在此时间段进行检测的患者可能会发现前臂和手指测量结果存在显著差异。在此时间段进行检测的患者应仅使用手指进行检测,因为这最能代表他们的真实血糖水平。在确定为餐前和餐后2小时的时间段进行检测的患者可能会发现前臂和手指测量结果存在微小差异。这些差异也不取决于患者控制疾病的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验