Suppr超能文献

不同日常生活活动能力测量方法对失用症和运动障碍的敏感性。

Sensitivity of different ADL measures to apraxia and motor impairments.

作者信息

Donkervoort Mireille, Dekker Joost, Deelman Betto G

机构信息

Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2002 May;16(3):299-305. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr492oa.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether specifically designed activities of daily living (ADL) observations can measure disability due to apraxia with more sensitivity than the Barthel ADL Index, a conventional functional scale.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Rehabilitation centres and nursing homes.

SUBJECTS

One hundred and six left hemisphere stroke patients with apraxia, hospitalized in rehabilitation centres and nursing homes.

MEASURES

ADL observations, Barthel ADL Index, an apraxia test, Motricity Index, Functional Motor Test.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses showed that the specific ADL observations were associated with severity of apraxia (and not with motor impairments). The Barthel ADL Index was associated with motor impairments (and not with severity of apraxia).

CONCLUSION

The assessment of disability in stroke patients with apraxia cannot rely only on the Barthel ADL Index. In addition, the specific ADL observation procedure is needed to measure disability due to apraxia.

摘要

目的

确定专门设计的日常生活活动(ADL)观察方法是否比传统功能量表巴氏ADL指数更能敏感地测量失用症导致的残疾情况。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

康复中心和疗养院。

研究对象

106名在康复中心和疗养院住院的左半球中风伴失用症患者。

测量方法

ADL观察、巴氏ADL指数、失用症测试、运动功能指数、功能性运动测试。

结果

多变量分析表明,特定的ADL观察与失用症严重程度相关(而非与运动障碍相关)。巴氏ADL指数与运动障碍相关(而非与失用症严重程度相关)。

结论

对中风伴失用症患者的残疾评估不能仅依赖巴氏ADL指数。此外,需要特定的ADL观察程序来测量失用症导致的残疾情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验