Coblentz W K, Coffey K P, Turner J E, Scarbrough D A, Skinner J V, Kellogg D W, Humphry J B
Department of Animal Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Apr;85(4):854-65. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74144-1.
Ruminal in situ disappearance kinetics of forages are commonly evaluated in confined animals, but there have been relatively few attempts to evaluate disappearance kinetics of forage dry matter (DM) in grazing animals. Our objectives were 1) to evaluate the effects of harvest technique and sampling date on the in situ DM disappearance kinetics and nutritive value of wheat (Triticum aestiuum L.) forage, and 2) to compare the in situ disappearance kinetics of DM for these forages when the experimental steers were housed in confinement with those obtained from steers grazing wheat pasture. Wheat forage was harvested on three dates (March 6, March 27, and April 11, 2000). Sampling techniques evaluated on each date included three clipping techniques (whole plant, random pluck, and top half) and two evaluations of masticates (oven dried at 50 degrees C or lyophilized). There was an interaction of harvest technique and sampling date main effects for crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin, and whole-plant ash. Disappearance kinetics of DM for these 15 forages were then evaluated by the in situ technique using five 393 +/- 54-kg crossbred steers consuming an alfalfa-based (Medicago sativa L.) diet in confinement, and subsequently, in five 448 +/- 49-kg crossbred steers grazing wheat pasture during March 2001. For fractions A, B, and C, potential extent, rate of disappearance (Kd), and effective ruminal degradability, linear regressions of values obtained for steers grazing wheat pasture on those obtained from confined cattle had significant slopes and exhibited high r2 statistics (>0.821). For fractions A and B, and Kd, the slope of these regression lines did not differ from unity, and the intercept did not differ from zero. For fraction C, potential extent of disappearance, and effective ruminal degradability, slopes were all equal to 1.19 and differed from unity. For effective degradability, deviation of the slope from unity can be explained, in part, on the basis of the passage rates used to calculate these values (0.035 and 0.062/h for confined and grazing steers, respectively). From a practical standpoint, the in situ disappearance kinetics of DM for these wheat forages did not appear to be altered substantially by evaluating them in grazing steers.
通常在圈养动物中评估牧草的瘤胃原位消失动力学,但评估放牧动物中牧草干物质(DM)消失动力学的尝试相对较少。我们的目标是:1)评估收获技术和采样日期对小麦(Triticum aestiuum L.)牧草原位DM消失动力学和营养价值的影响;2)比较当实验阉牛圈养时和放牧小麦牧场时这些牧草DM的原位消失动力学。于三个日期(2000年3月6日、3月27日和4月11日)收获小麦牧草。在每个日期评估的采样技术包括三种刈割技术(整株、随机采摘和上半部分)以及对咀嚼物的两种评估方法(在50摄氏度下烘干或冻干)。粗蛋白(CP)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)、酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)、半纤维素、纤维素、木质素和全株灰分存在收获技术和采样日期主效应的交互作用。然后使用五头体重393±54千克的杂交阉牛,在圈养条件下采食以苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)为基础的日粮,随后又使用五头体重448±49千克的杂交阉牛于2001年3月放牧小麦牧场,通过原位技术评估这15种牧草DM的消失动力学。对于组分A、B和C,潜在消失程度、消失速率(Kd)和有效瘤胃降解率,放牧小麦牧场阉牛所得值与圈养阉牛所得值的线性回归具有显著斜率且r2统计值较高(>0.821)。对于组分A和B以及Kd,这些回归线的斜率与1无差异,截距与0无差异。对于组分C、潜在消失程度和有效瘤胃降解率,斜率均等于1.19且与1不同。对于有效降解率,斜率与1的偏差部分可根据用于计算这些值的通过率来解释(圈养和放牧阉牛分别为每小时0.035和0.062)。从实际角度来看,通过在放牧阉牛中评估这些小麦牧草的DM原位消失动力学,其似乎并未发生实质性改变。