Almén T, Aspelin P
Invest Radiol. 1975 Nov-Dec;10(6):557-63. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197511000-00003.
Three different types of contrast media, monomeric ionic, dimeric ionic and monomeric non-ionic, were tested and compared concerning their toxicity on three experimental models: I. Pulmonary artery and aortic pressure after contrast medium injection into the right atrium in rabbits: II. Ventricular contractile force and heart rate after perfusion of the coronary arteries on the isolated rabbit heart: III. Aortic endothelium of rats. Non-ionic contrast medium was, in all three experiments, less toxic than monomeric ionic; thus it caused less rise in pulmonary artery pressure (I) and caused less reduction in ventricular contractile force and heart rate (II) and caused less damage on aortic endothelium of rats (III). The non-ionic contrast medium also gave less toxic reaction in two (I and II) of the three models compared to the dimericionic contrast medium. In experimental model III there was no difference between these two agents. Also, the dimeric ionic contrast medium caused less toxic reactions in all three models than the monomeric ionic contrast medium.
测试并比较了三种不同类型的造影剂,即单体离子型、二聚体离子型和单体非离子型,考察它们对三种实验模型的毒性:一、向兔右心房注射造影剂后肺动脉和主动脉压力;二、对离体兔心脏冠状动脉灌注后心室收缩力和心率;三、大鼠主动脉内皮。在所有这三个实验中,非离子型造影剂的毒性均低于单体离子型造影剂;因此,它导致的肺动脉压力升高较小(实验一),心室收缩力和心率降低较小(实验二),对大鼠主动脉内皮的损伤较小(实验三)。与二聚体离子型造影剂相比,非离子型造影剂在这三种模型中的两种(实验一和实验二)中产生的毒性反应也较小。在实验模型三中,这两种造影剂之间没有差异。此外,二聚体离子型造影剂在所有三个模型中引起的毒性反应均比单体离子型造影剂小。