Holtappels Rafaela, Grzimek Natascha K A, Simon Christian O, Thomas Doris, Dreis Doris, Reddehase Matthias J
Institute for Virology, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55101 Mainz, Germany.
J Virol. 2002 Jun;76(12):6044-53. doi: 10.1128/jvi.76.12.6044-6053.2002.
CD8 T cells are the principal effector cells in the resolution of acute murine cytomegalovirus (mCMV) infection in host organs. This undoubted antiviral and protective in vivo function of CD8 T cells appeared to be inconsistent with immunosubversive strategies of the virus effected by early (E)-phase genes m04, m06, and m152. The so-called immune evasion proteins gp34, gp48, and gp37/40, respectively, were found to interfere with peptide presentation at different steps in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I pathway of antigen processing and presentation in fibroblasts. Accordingly, they were proposed to prevent recognition and lysis of infected fibroblasts by cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) during the E phase of viral gene expression. We document here that the previously identified MHC class I D(d)-restricted antigenic peptide (257)AGPPRYSRI(265) encoded by gene m164 is processed as well as presented for recognition by m164-specific CTL during the E and late phases of viral replication in the very same cells in which the immunosubversive viral proteins are effectual in preventing the presentation of processed immediate-early 1 (m123-exon 4) peptide (168)YPHFMPTNL(176). Thus, while immunosubversion is a reality, these mechanisms are apparently not as efficient as the term immune evasion implies. The pORFm164-derived peptide is the first noted peptide that constitutively escapes the immunosubversive viral functions. The most important consequence is that even the concerted action of all immunosubversive E-phase proteins eventually fails to prevent immune recognition in the E phase. The bottom-line message is that there exists no immune evasion of mCMV in fibroblasts.
CD8 T细胞是宿主器官中急性小鼠巨细胞病毒(mCMV)感染消退过程中的主要效应细胞。CD8 T细胞这种毋庸置疑的体内抗病毒和保护功能,似乎与病毒早期(E)阶段基因m04、m06和m152所实施的免疫颠覆策略不一致。分别被称为免疫逃逸蛋白的gp34、gp48和gp37/40,被发现会在成纤维细胞抗原加工和呈递的主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)I类途径的不同步骤干扰肽的呈递。因此,有人提出它们可在病毒基因表达的E阶段防止细胞毒性T淋巴细胞(CTL)识别和裂解被感染的成纤维细胞。我们在此证明,先前鉴定出的由基因m164编码的MHC I类D(d)限制性抗原肽(257)AGPPRYSRI(265),在病毒复制的E期和后期,在与免疫颠覆病毒蛋白有效阻止加工后的即刻早期1(m123外显子4)肽(168)YPHFMPTNL(176)呈递的相同细胞中,能够被加工并呈递以供m164特异性CTL识别。因此,虽然免疫颠覆是事实,但这些机制显然不像免疫逃逸这个术语所暗示的那么有效。源自开放阅读框m164的肽是首个被注意到的能持续逃脱免疫颠覆病毒功能的肽。最重要的结果是,即使所有免疫颠覆E阶段蛋白协同作用,最终也无法在E阶段阻止免疫识别。关键信息是,成纤维细胞中不存在mCMV的免疫逃逸。