Kelso J A, Cook E, Olson M E, Epstein W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1975 Aug;1(3):237-45. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.1.3.237.
Experimental subjects were exposed to prism-induced visual displacement of a target whose location was correctly given by proprioceptive-kinesthetic information. Control subjects were exposed alternately to visual displacement or proprioceptive-kinesthetic location information. During the adaptation period, experimental subjects in the visual attention condition performed a localization task that directed them to attend selectively to the visual modality; experimental subjects in the proprioceptive attention condition attended selectively to the proprioceptive modaltiy; control subjects performed the task on the basis of the available modality. Measures of adaptation and aftereffect were secured separately in each of the two modalities. These confirmed the predictions that the shifts in the experimental conditions would be confirmed to localization tests dependent on the unattended modality and that control subjects would not exhibit adaptation. We proposed that allocation of attention determines situational dominance and that dominance determines the locus of adaptation. The findings were compared to those reported by Canon (1970) and were applied to a reassessment of the "visual capture" phenomenon.
实验对象暴露于由棱镜引起的目标视觉位移中，目标的位置可通过本体感觉 - 动觉信息正确给出。对照对象则交替暴露于视觉位移或本体感觉 - 动觉位置信息中。在适应期，处于视觉注意条件下的实验对象执行一项定位任务，该任务引导他们有选择地关注视觉模态；处于本体感觉注意条件下的实验对象有选择地关注本体感觉模态；对照对象根据可用的模态执行任务。在两种模态中的每一种中分别获得适应和后效的测量结果。这些结果证实了以下预测：实验条件的变化将在依赖于未被关注模态的定位测试中得到证实，并且对照对象不会表现出适应。我们提出，注意力的分配决定情境优势，而优势决定适应的位点。将这些发现与佳能（1970年）报告的结果进行了比较，并应用于对“视觉捕获”现象的重新评估。
