• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰的患者投诉系统。

The patients' complaints system in New Zealand.

作者信息

Paterson Ron

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 May-Jun;21(3):70-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.70.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.70
PMID:12026005
Abstract

Since 1996 New Zealand has had a Code of Patients' Rights enforceable by complaints to an independent ombudsman. Patients are entitled to receive health care of an appropriate standard, to give informed consent, and to complain to a health commissioner about perceived malpractice. The commissioner investigates and reports on complaints, recommends practice changes by providers, is a gatekeeper to discipline by professional boards, and acts as a public advocate for patient safety. In this paper the current commissioner describes New Zealand's experience with the patients' complaints system and discusses the implications for the quality of health care.

摘要

自1996年以来,新西兰实行了《患者权利准则》,可通过向独立监察员投诉来执行。患者有权获得适当标准的医疗保健,有权给予知情同意,并就所察觉到的医疗过失向卫生专员投诉。专员对投诉进行调查并报告,建议医疗服务提供者改变做法,是专业委员会进行纪律处分的把关人,并作为患者安全的公众倡导者。在本文中,现任专员描述了新西兰患者投诉系统的经验,并讨论了其对医疗保健质量的影响。

相似文献

1
The patients' complaints system in New Zealand.新西兰的患者投诉系统。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 May-Jun;21(3):70-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.70.
2
Patients' rights in New Zealand: complaints resolution and quality improvement.新西兰患者的权利:投诉解决与质量提升。
Med Law. 2004;23(1):29-37.
3
Complaints and quality: handle with care!投诉与质量:谨慎处理!
N Z Med J. 2004 Jul 23;117(1198):U970.
4
Protecting patients' rights in New Zealand.在新西兰保护患者权利。
Med Law. 2005 Mar;24(1):51-60.
5
The Ombudsman's involvement in ensuring patients' rights.监察员在保障患者权利方面的参与。
Med Law. 1997;16(3):473-86.
6
Relationship between complaints and quality of care in New Zealand: a descriptive analysis of complainants and non-complainants following adverse events.新西兰投诉与医疗质量的关系:对不良事件后投诉者和未投诉者的描述性分析。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Feb;15(1):17-22. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015743.
7
[Briefing and accusation of medical malpractice--the second victim].医疗事故的通报与指控——第二位受害者
Laryngorhinootologie. 2013 Apr;92 Suppl 1:S1-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333252. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
8
Access to justice for New Zealand health consumers.新西兰医疗消费者的司法救助。
J Law Med. 2010 Sep;18(1):178-94.
9
The impact of no-fault compensation on the regulation of medical practice in New Zealand.无过错赔偿对新西兰医疗执业监管的影响。
Med Law. 1993;12(1-2):61-9.
10
Setting the standard? New Zealand's approach to ensuring health and disability services of an appropriate standard.制定标准?新西兰确保适当标准的健康与残疾服务的方法。
J Law Med. 2005 Aug;13(1):125-34.

引用本文的文献

1
It Is Time to Take Complaints Seriously? An Exploratory Analysis of Communications Sent by Users to a Public Healthcare Agency before, during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic.是时候认真对待投诉了?对公共医疗保健机构在 COVID-19 大流行前后期间收到的用户投诉进行的探索性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 28;21(10):1299. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101299.
2
Multilevel governance framework on grievance redressal for patient rights violations in India.印度解决侵犯患者权利行为申诉的多层级治理框架。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Oct 12;36(9):1470-1482. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab066.
3
Re: The need for healthcare reforms: is no-fault liability the solution to medical malpractice?
关于:医疗保健改革的必要性:无过错责任是医疗事故的解决方案吗?
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019 Jun 14;11(2):147-151. doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00090-6. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Towards a multilevel governance framework on the implementation of patient rights in health facilities: a protocol for a systematic scoping review.关于在卫生机构实施患者权利的多层次治理框架:系统范围综述的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 15;10(10):e038927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038927.
5
The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments.瑞士医生评级网站上叙事评论的内容与性质:对849条评论的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 30;21(9):e14336. doi: 10.2196/14336.
6
Contribution of the Health Ombud to Accountability: The Life Esidimeni Tragedy in South Africa.卫生申诉专员对问责制的贡献:南非的伊西迪梅尼生命悲剧
Health Hum Rights. 2018 Dec;20(2):161-168.
7
Unheard voices: complaint patterns of older persons in the health care system.被忽视的声音:老年人在医疗保健系统中的投诉模式
Eur J Ageing. 2011 Feb 15;8(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0177-5. eCollection 2011 Mar.
8
Why service users do not complain or have 'voice': a mixed-methods study from Nepal's rural primary health care system.为何服务对象不投诉或没有“发言权”:一项来自尼泊尔农村初级卫生保健系统的混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 25;17(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2034-5.
9
Development of a scale for the evaluation of patients' rights prerequisites at educational hospitals in Iran: a study using the Delphi technique.伊朗教学医院患者权利前提条件评估量表的开发:一项采用德尔菲技术的研究
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2015 Nov 14;8:12. eCollection 2015.
10
Using Patient-Reported Information to Improve Clinical Practice.利用患者报告的信息改善临床实践。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2116-54. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12420. Epub 2015 Nov 17.