Grey Mark, Henry Chuck
Synagro West, Inc., Corona, CA 92878-7027, USA.
J Environ Qual. 2002 May-Jun;31(3):926-36. doi: 10.2134/jeq2002.9260.
Municipal biosolids are typically not used on the steepest of forested slopes in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. The primary concern in using biosolids on steep slopes is movement of biosolids particles and soluble nutrients to surface waters during runoff events. We examined the pattern and extent of P and N runoff from a perennial stream draining a small, forested 21.4-ha watershed in western Washington before and after biosolids application. In this study, we applied biosolids at a rate of 13.5 Mg ha(-1) (700 kg N ha(-1) and 500 kg P ha(-1)) to 40% of the watershed following nearly 1.5 years of pre-application water sampling and 1.5 years thereafter. There was no evidence of direct runoff of P or N from biosolids into surface water. Elevated surface water discharge did not change the concentration of PO4-P, biologically available phosphorus (BAP), bioavailable particulate phosphorus (BPP), or total P nor did it affect the concentration-discharge relationship. Some instances of total P concentrations exceeding the USEPA surface water standard of 0.1 mg L(-1) were observed following biosolids application. However, total P in 27 Creek was predominately in particulate form and not labile, suggesting that detritus moving into the main creek channel and ephemeral drainage courses may be the principal P source. Ammonium N concentrations in runoff water were consistent before and after biosolids application, ranging from below detection limits (0.01 mg L(-1)) to 0.1 mg L(-1); no concentration-discharge relationship existed. Biosolids application changed the 27 Creek concentration-discharge relationship for NO3(-)-N. Before application, no relationship existed. Beginning nine months after biosolids application, increases in discharge were positively related to increases in NO3(-)-N concentrations. Nitrate concentrations in runoff following biosolids application were approximately 10 times less than the USEPA drinking water standard of 10 mg L(-1).
在美国太平洋西北部,城市生物固体通常不会用于坡度最陡的森林山坡。在陡坡上使用生物固体的主要担忧是在径流事件期间生物固体颗粒和可溶性养分向地表水的移动。我们研究了在华盛顿州西部一个面积为21.4公顷的小型森林流域施用生物固体前后,一条常年溪流中磷和氮的径流模式及范围。在本研究中,在近1.5年的施用前水样采集以及之后的1.5年里,我们以13.5 Mg ha(-1)(700 kg N ha(-1)和500 kg P ha(-1))的速率将生物固体施用于该流域的40%。没有证据表明生物固体中的磷或氮直接径流到地表水。地表水流量增加并未改变PO4-P、生物可利用磷(BAP)、生物可利用颗粒磷(BPP)或总磷的浓度,也未影响浓度-流量关系。在施用生物固体后,观察到了一些总磷浓度超过美国环保署地表水标准0.1 mg L(-1)的情况。然而,27号溪中的总磷主要以颗粒形式存在且不稳定,这表明进入主溪河道和季节性排水河道的碎屑可能是主要的磷源。施用生物固体前后径流水中铵态氮浓度一致,范围从低于检测限(0.01 mg L(-1))到0.1 mg L(-1);不存在浓度-流量关系。施用生物固体改变了27号溪中NO3(-)-N的浓度-流量关系。施用前不存在这种关系。在施用生物固体九个月后,流量增加与NO3(-)-N浓度增加呈正相关。施用生物固体后径流中的硝酸盐浓度比美国环保署饮用水标准10 mg L(-1)低约10倍。