Suppr超能文献

择期冠状动脉搭桥术中肺动脉导管置入:麻醉诱导前还是诱导后?

Pulmonary artery catheter placement for elective coronary artery bypass grafting: before or after anesthetic induction?

作者信息

Wall Michael H, MacGregor Drew A, Kennedy Daniel J, James Robert L, Butterworth John, Mallak Kathryn F, Royster Roger L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1009, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2002 Jun;94(6):1409-15, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200206000-00006.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Pulmonary arterial catheters (PACs) are often used during and after coronary artery bypass grafting. We hypothesized that placement of a PAC would be faster in anesthetized patients. We further hypothesized that the presence or absence of a PAC during the induction of anesthesia would make no difference in hemodynamics, vasoactive drug use, or IV fluid administration during the induction. Patients (n = 200) undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were assigned to PAC insertion either before or after the induction of anesthesia. Total time for PAC insertion, number of finder needle and venous catheter insertion attempts, incidence of carotid artery puncture, arrhythmias or ST segment changes, arterial blood gas analysis, hemodynamic variables, IV fluids, and vasoactive drugs required during and after the anesthetic induction were recorded. Thirty-two different physicians placed the PACs. PAC placement was faster (10 versus 12 min, P = 0.0003) and required fewer punctures with a finder needle (P = 0.0107) in anesthetized patients. There were no significant differences between groups in hemodynamic values or use of vasoactive or anesthetic drugs or IV fluids during the induction. There were also no significant differences between groups in the incidence of myocardial ischemia, arterial hypoxemia, or hypercarbia. Placement of a PAC before the induction of anesthesia consumes more time and fails to improve hemodynamic stability or lessen vasoactive drug use during the induction of anesthesia.

IMPLICATIONS

Insertion of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) before the induction of anesthesia requires more needle sticks and takes longer than insertion after the induction of anesthesia; moreover, previous PAC insertion has no significant effect on hemodynamics or use of vasoactive drugs or IV fluid associated with the induction of anesthesia.

摘要

未标注

肺动脉导管(PACs)常用于冠状动脉旁路移植术期间及术后。我们假设在麻醉患者中放置PACs会更快。我们进一步假设在麻醉诱导期间是否存在PACs对诱导期间的血流动力学、血管活性药物使用或静脉输液管理没有影响。接受择期冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者(n = 200)被分配在麻醉诱导前或后插入PACs。记录PACs插入的总时间、引导针和静脉导管插入尝试的次数、颈动脉穿刺、心律失常或ST段改变的发生率、动脉血气分析、血流动力学变量、静脉输液以及麻醉诱导期间及之后所需的血管活性药物。32位不同的医生放置了PACs。在麻醉患者中,PACs放置更快(10分钟对12分钟,P = 0.0003),且引导针穿刺次数更少(P = 0.0107)。两组在诱导期间的血流动力学值、血管活性或麻醉药物使用或静脉输液方面没有显著差异。两组在心肌缺血、动脉低氧血症或高碳酸血症的发生率方面也没有显著差异。在麻醉诱导前放置PACs会消耗更多时间,且未能改善麻醉诱导期间的血流动力学稳定性或减少血管活性药物的使用。

启示

在麻醉诱导前插入肺动脉导管(PACs)比诱导后插入需要更多的针刺且耗时更长;此外,先前插入PACs对与麻醉诱导相关的血流动力学、血管活性药物使用或静脉输液没有显著影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验